Comparative study on photocatalytic efficiency of Mg doped CuFeO2 versus TiO2 doped CuFeO2 delafossite based on their application for the removal of tartrazine yellow dye

Sayam Bhattacharyya , Sk Aakash Hossain , Sampad Sarkar , Papita Das
{"title":"Comparative study on photocatalytic efficiency of Mg doped CuFeO2 versus TiO2 doped CuFeO2 delafossite based on their application for the removal of tartrazine yellow dye","authors":"Sayam Bhattacharyya ,&nbsp;Sk Aakash Hossain ,&nbsp;Sampad Sarkar ,&nbsp;Papita Das","doi":"10.1016/j.cinorg.2025.100089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present work highlights the comparative analysis between Mg doped CuFeO<sub>2</sub> (named as Mg-CFO) and TiO<sub>2</sub>/CuFeO<sub>2</sub> composite (named as TiO<sub>2</sub>-CFO) for the photodegradation of TZ dye in aqueous solution. Physicochemical tests like XRD, FTIR, FESEM, EDX was done for both the composites. The pH<sub>pzc</sub> values of Mg-CFO and TiO<sub>2</sub>-CFO were determined to be 9.34 and 9.0 respectively for which both photocatalysts gave good removal efficiency of anionic TZ in an acidic or lower pH region. Mg-CFO degraded 87 ​% of 20 ​mg ​L<sup>−1</sup> of TZ in 100 ​mL of solution at 50 ​mg dosage, under pH∼2, at 130 ​rpm and 30 ​°C temperature showing a rate constant of 0.00602 min<sup>−1</sup> and TiO<sub>2</sub>-CFO degraded 91 ​% of TZ dye under the same conditions showing a rate constant of 0.00637 min<sup>−1</sup>. The quenching test showed that both photocatalysts had generated O<sub>2</sub><sup>°-</sup> radicals as the primary species and OH<sup>°</sup> as the secondary species. In general, TiO<sub>2</sub>-CFO composite was proved to be a comparatively better photocatalyst than Mg-CFO sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100233,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry of Inorganic Materials","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry of Inorganic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949746925000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work highlights the comparative analysis between Mg doped CuFeO2 (named as Mg-CFO) and TiO2/CuFeO2 composite (named as TiO2-CFO) for the photodegradation of TZ dye in aqueous solution. Physicochemical tests like XRD, FTIR, FESEM, EDX was done for both the composites. The pHpzc values of Mg-CFO and TiO2-CFO were determined to be 9.34 and 9.0 respectively for which both photocatalysts gave good removal efficiency of anionic TZ in an acidic or lower pH region. Mg-CFO degraded 87 ​% of 20 ​mg ​L−1 of TZ in 100 ​mL of solution at 50 ​mg dosage, under pH∼2, at 130 ​rpm and 30 ​°C temperature showing a rate constant of 0.00602 min−1 and TiO2-CFO degraded 91 ​% of TZ dye under the same conditions showing a rate constant of 0.00637 min−1. The quenching test showed that both photocatalysts had generated O2°- radicals as the primary species and OH° as the secondary species. In general, TiO2-CFO composite was proved to be a comparatively better photocatalyst than Mg-CFO sample.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信