Assessing the Significance of Machine Learning in Forecasting Energy Recovery from Waste

Nirzona Binta Badal , Fahmida Anjum , Ismail Mahmud Nur , Tithi Paul , Ahmed Wasif Reza
{"title":"Assessing the Significance of Machine Learning in Forecasting Energy Recovery from Waste","authors":"Nirzona Binta Badal ,&nbsp;Fahmida Anjum ,&nbsp;Ismail Mahmud Nur ,&nbsp;Tithi Paul ,&nbsp;Ahmed Wasif Reza","doi":"10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimating energy recovery from trash is vital for optimizing the Waste-to-Energy (WTE) mechanisms essential in tackling global waste management processes and energy sustainability issues. This paper analyzes a synthetically expanded dataset generated with the help of SMOTE techniques to compare the performance of four machine learning (ML) models, Decision Tree Regression, Random Forest Regression, CatBoost Regression, and XGBoost Regression. Here, the dataset contains important waste parameters like composition, moisture content, and treatment procedures that help the models forecast energy output with high precision—datasets and evaluate additional machine learning techniques to boost prediction accuracy in industrial WTE systems further. Performance indicators like MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and R² scores have been assessed here to identify each model’s accuracy and computational efficiency. The final result of the analysis states that the ensemble based models, more precisely XG-Boost and CatBoost, outperformed the simpler ones like Decision Tree, where CatBoost achieved the best R² value of 0.9893 and the minimum MAPE of 12.90 percent. Though using little extra storage, CatBoost showed great performance. The obtained results bring useful insights into efficient model selection for WTE applications. Further studies shall therefore be exclusively focused on validating this study’s results in real life conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20465,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Computer Science","volume":"252 ","pages":"Pages 623-632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050925000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimating energy recovery from trash is vital for optimizing the Waste-to-Energy (WTE) mechanisms essential in tackling global waste management processes and energy sustainability issues. This paper analyzes a synthetically expanded dataset generated with the help of SMOTE techniques to compare the performance of four machine learning (ML) models, Decision Tree Regression, Random Forest Regression, CatBoost Regression, and XGBoost Regression. Here, the dataset contains important waste parameters like composition, moisture content, and treatment procedures that help the models forecast energy output with high precision—datasets and evaluate additional machine learning techniques to boost prediction accuracy in industrial WTE systems further. Performance indicators like MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and R² scores have been assessed here to identify each model’s accuracy and computational efficiency. The final result of the analysis states that the ensemble based models, more precisely XG-Boost and CatBoost, outperformed the simpler ones like Decision Tree, where CatBoost achieved the best R² value of 0.9893 and the minimum MAPE of 12.90 percent. Though using little extra storage, CatBoost showed great performance. The obtained results bring useful insights into efficient model selection for WTE applications. Further studies shall therefore be exclusively focused on validating this study’s results in real life conditions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信