Fake News Detection: Exploring the Efficiency of Soft and Hard Voting Ensemble

Arifur Rahman , Sakib Zaman , Shahriar Parvej , Pintu Chandra Shill , Md. Shahidul Salim , Dola Das
{"title":"Fake News Detection: Exploring the Efficiency of Soft and Hard Voting Ensemble","authors":"Arifur Rahman ,&nbsp;Sakib Zaman ,&nbsp;Shahriar Parvej ,&nbsp;Pintu Chandra Shill ,&nbsp;Md. Shahidul Salim ,&nbsp;Dola Das","doi":"10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fake news dissemination is a critical problem, jeopardizing the reliability of information and eroding public confidence. Machine learning provides a solution by distinguishing between real and misleading news. In this study, we utilized various classifiers such as KNN, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, LightGBM, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Naive Bayes on an open-source dataset. Tf-idf (Term frequency-inverse document frequency) and Count vectorization were used for text preprocessing, and soft and hard voting ensembles were applied to the best three and five models to boost performance. Additionally, we employed BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models with various optimizers (adam, rmsprop, SGD, adadelta, and adagrad) to further improve classification. The BERT model, optimized with adam, achieved the highest accuracy of 99.93%, with perfect precision (100%) and high recall (99.84%). Furthermore, using Count vectorization for feature extraction, the soft voting ensemble of the top five models (LGBM, XGB, RF, DT, LR) achieved peak performance among all ensemble models, achieving 99.87% accuracy, with precision, recall, f1-score, MAE, MSE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE of 99.83%, 99.88%, 99.86%, 0.13%, 0.13%, 3.66%, 0.27%, and 7.80%, respectively. The exhaustive experimentation confirms the applicability and efficiency of the recommended models in identifying fake news.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20465,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Computer Science","volume":"252 ","pages":"Pages 748-757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050925000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fake news dissemination is a critical problem, jeopardizing the reliability of information and eroding public confidence. Machine learning provides a solution by distinguishing between real and misleading news. In this study, we utilized various classifiers such as KNN, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, LightGBM, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Naive Bayes on an open-source dataset. Tf-idf (Term frequency-inverse document frequency) and Count vectorization were used for text preprocessing, and soft and hard voting ensembles were applied to the best three and five models to boost performance. Additionally, we employed BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models with various optimizers (adam, rmsprop, SGD, adadelta, and adagrad) to further improve classification. The BERT model, optimized with adam, achieved the highest accuracy of 99.93%, with perfect precision (100%) and high recall (99.84%). Furthermore, using Count vectorization for feature extraction, the soft voting ensemble of the top five models (LGBM, XGB, RF, DT, LR) achieved peak performance among all ensemble models, achieving 99.87% accuracy, with precision, recall, f1-score, MAE, MSE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE of 99.83%, 99.88%, 99.86%, 0.13%, 0.13%, 3.66%, 0.27%, and 7.80%, respectively. The exhaustive experimentation confirms the applicability and efficiency of the recommended models in identifying fake news.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信