Which Matters More for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival: Witnessed Arrest or Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-02-18 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038427
Cheng-Yi Fan, Ya-Ting Liang, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Jiun-Wei Chen, Wen-Chu Chiang, Charlotte Wang, Chih-Wei Sung
{"title":"Which Matters More for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival: Witnessed Arrest or Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?","authors":"Cheng-Yi Fan, Ya-Ting Liang, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Jiun-Wei Chen, Wen-Chu Chiang, Charlotte Wang, Chih-Wei Sung","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the well-known importance of witnessed arrest and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, previous studies have shown significant statistical inconsistencies. We hypothesized an interaction effect and conducted stratified analyses to investigate whether witnessed arrest is more important than bystander CPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2022 in 3 emergency medical service (systems in Taiwan). Data were extracted from emergency medical service dispatch reports, including patient characteristics, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, time for each dispatch, and prehospital interventions. The outcome measure was prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Patients were categorized into 4 groups: witnessed and bystander CPR present (W+B+), witnessed present but bystander CPR absent (W+B-), witnessed absent but bystander CPR present (W-B+), and witnessed and bystander CPR absent (W-B-). Multiple logistic regression on prehospital ROSC were performed in the 4 subgroups separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 737 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were identified, of whom 977 (6.6%) achieved prehospital ROSC. The W+B+ group exhibited the highest prehospital ROSC rate (14.0%). Stratification confirmed a statistically significant interaction between witnessed arrest and bystander CPR. Defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, and epinephrine administration were significantly associated with prehospital ROSC in all subgroups. Most explanatory variables significant in the witnessed arrest group were adjusted for in the nonwitnessed arrest group. Younger age was associated with prehospital ROSC only in the W+B+ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Witnessed arrest and bystander CPR may interact to predict prehospital ROSC in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with witnessed arrest likely having more significant impact on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038427"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the well-known importance of witnessed arrest and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, previous studies have shown significant statistical inconsistencies. We hypothesized an interaction effect and conducted stratified analyses to investigate whether witnessed arrest is more important than bystander CPR.

Methods: This study enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2022 in 3 emergency medical service (systems in Taiwan). Data were extracted from emergency medical service dispatch reports, including patient characteristics, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, time for each dispatch, and prehospital interventions. The outcome measure was prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Patients were categorized into 4 groups: witnessed and bystander CPR present (W+B+), witnessed present but bystander CPR absent (W+B-), witnessed absent but bystander CPR present (W-B+), and witnessed and bystander CPR absent (W-B-). Multiple logistic regression on prehospital ROSC were performed in the 4 subgroups separately.

Results: A total of 14 737 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were identified, of whom 977 (6.6%) achieved prehospital ROSC. The W+B+ group exhibited the highest prehospital ROSC rate (14.0%). Stratification confirmed a statistically significant interaction between witnessed arrest and bystander CPR. Defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, and epinephrine administration were significantly associated with prehospital ROSC in all subgroups. Most explanatory variables significant in the witnessed arrest group were adjusted for in the nonwitnessed arrest group. Younger age was associated with prehospital ROSC only in the W+B+ group.

Conclusions: Witnessed arrest and bystander CPR may interact to predict prehospital ROSC in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with witnessed arrest likely having more significant impact on outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信