Comparative Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-02-18 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.037510
Takefumi Kishimori, Takao Kato, Atsuyuki Wada, Akira Tani, Ryosuke Yamaji, Jumpei Koike, Yoshihiro Iwasaki, Takehiro Matsumoto, Takafumi Yagi, Masaharu Okada
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Takefumi Kishimori, Takao Kato, Atsuyuki Wada, Akira Tani, Ryosuke Yamaji, Jumpei Koike, Yoshihiro Iwasaki, Takehiro Matsumoto, Takafumi Yagi, Masaharu Okada","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.037510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials showed that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) significantly improved the control of diabetes and reduced body weight compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i). However, it is unclear whether GLP1-RA is effective compared with DPP-4i in patients with heart failure (HF) with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of GLP1-RA compared with DPP-4i in all-cause death and hospitalization in patients with HF and T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective observational study using TriNetX, a global health care data and analytics platform, included patients with HF and T2D who had received GLP1-RA or DPP-4i from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. Primary outcome was 12-month incidence of all-cause death. Secondary outcome was hospitalization. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs to evaluate outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 005 097 patients with HF and T2D, 57 965 initiated GLP1-RA and 77 098 initiated DPP-4i. After propensity score matching, the number of participants in both the GLP1-RA group and the DPP-4i group was 36 557. The proportion of 12-month incidence of all-cause death was lower in the GLP1-RA group than in the DPP-4i group (5.9% [2140/36 557] versus 8.5% [3103/36 557]; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.71]).The proportion of 12-month incidence of hospitalization was also lower in the GLP1-RA group than in the DPP-4i group (42.3% [15 455/36 557] versus 48.5% [17 733/36 557]; OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.76-0.80]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of GLP1-RA for patients with HF and T2D was associated with reduced 12-month incidence of all-cause death and hospitalization compared with DPP-4i.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e037510"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.037510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials showed that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) significantly improved the control of diabetes and reduced body weight compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i). However, it is unclear whether GLP1-RA is effective compared with DPP-4i in patients with heart failure (HF) with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of GLP1-RA compared with DPP-4i in all-cause death and hospitalization in patients with HF and T2D.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study using TriNetX, a global health care data and analytics platform, included patients with HF and T2D who had received GLP1-RA or DPP-4i from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. Primary outcome was 12-month incidence of all-cause death. Secondary outcome was hospitalization. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs to evaluate outcome measures.

Results: Among 1 005 097 patients with HF and T2D, 57 965 initiated GLP1-RA and 77 098 initiated DPP-4i. After propensity score matching, the number of participants in both the GLP1-RA group and the DPP-4i group was 36 557. The proportion of 12-month incidence of all-cause death was lower in the GLP1-RA group than in the DPP-4i group (5.9% [2140/36 557] versus 8.5% [3103/36 557]; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.71]).The proportion of 12-month incidence of hospitalization was also lower in the GLP1-RA group than in the DPP-4i group (42.3% [15 455/36 557] versus 48.5% [17 733/36 557]; OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.76-0.80]).

Conclusions: Use of GLP1-RA for patients with HF and T2D was associated with reduced 12-month incidence of all-cause death and hospitalization compared with DPP-4i.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信