The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x
Yaliva Dorreman, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Piet Pattyn, Claude Bertrand, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Philippe Nafteux, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Elke Van Daele
{"title":"The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers.","authors":"Yaliva Dorreman, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Piet Pattyn, Claude Bertrand, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Philippe Nafteux, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Elke Van Daele","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly invasive procedure with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. The literature suggests a clear volume outcome correlation. Since 2019, esophageal surgery has been centralized in Belgium. In 2019, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines were published for esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of implementation of these ERAS guidelines in Belgium. Surgeons from centralized esophageal surgery centers in Belgium were questioned. A Delphi questionnaire regarding peri-operative ERAS care and center-specific outcome data were sent to all participating surgeons. An ERAS scoring system was created to estimate and compare the level of ERAS implementation. Length of stay, post-operative pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and 30-day and 90-day mortality were evaluated. A high response rate of 94.1% was achieved. All surgeons used a peri-operative protocol in their center. The mean ERAS score for Belgian surgeons was 15.5 out of 20. The highest ERAS score per center is 18.6. Anastomotic leakage rate is 14.6% and post-operative pneumonia rate is 20.8% in Belgium. The mean length of stay is 12 days. Mortality after 30 days and 90 days are, respectively, 3.2% and 6.6%. This study gives an overview of the Belgian situation regarding the implementation of ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery centers. The overall implementation of ERAS guidelines in Belgium is good, but there is room for improvement in terms of uniformity nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly invasive procedure with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. The literature suggests a clear volume outcome correlation. Since 2019, esophageal surgery has been centralized in Belgium. In 2019, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines were published for esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of implementation of these ERAS guidelines in Belgium. Surgeons from centralized esophageal surgery centers in Belgium were questioned. A Delphi questionnaire regarding peri-operative ERAS care and center-specific outcome data were sent to all participating surgeons. An ERAS scoring system was created to estimate and compare the level of ERAS implementation. Length of stay, post-operative pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and 30-day and 90-day mortality were evaluated. A high response rate of 94.1% was achieved. All surgeons used a peri-operative protocol in their center. The mean ERAS score for Belgian surgeons was 15.5 out of 20. The highest ERAS score per center is 18.6. Anastomotic leakage rate is 14.6% and post-operative pneumonia rate is 20.8% in Belgium. The mean length of stay is 12 days. Mortality after 30 days and 90 days are, respectively, 3.2% and 6.6%. This study gives an overview of the Belgian situation regarding the implementation of ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery centers. The overall implementation of ERAS guidelines in Belgium is good, but there is room for improvement in terms of uniformity nationally.

eras在比利时食道手术中心的实施。
食管癌切除术是一种高度侵入性的手术,术后发病率和死亡率很高。文献显示了明显的容积预后相关性。自2019年以来,食管手术集中在比利时。2019年,食管切除术术后增强恢复(ERAS)指南发布。本研究的目的是评估这些ERAS指南在比利时的实施水平。来自比利时集中食道手术中心的外科医生被询问。向所有参与手术的外科医生发送关于ERAS围手术期护理和中心特定结果数据的德尔菲问卷。建立了一个ERAS评分系统来评估和比较ERAS的实施水平。观察住院时间、术后肺炎、吻合口瘘、30天和90天死亡率。该方法的有效率高达94.1%。所有的外科医生在他们的中心都使用围手术期协议。比利时外科医生的ERAS平均评分为15.5分(满分20分)。每个中锋的最高era得分是18.6。比利时吻合口瘘发生率为14.6%,术后肺炎发生率为20.8%。平均停留时间为12天。30天和90天后的死亡率分别为3.2%和6.6%。本研究概述了比利时食道手术中心实施ERAS方案的情况。在比利时,ERAS指导方针的总体执行情况良好,但在全国统一方面仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信