A Hybrid Machine Learning CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Curatively Resected Colorectal Cancer.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tingting Hong, Heng Zhang, Qiming Zhao, Li Liu, Jun Sun, Shudong Hu, Yong Mao
{"title":"A Hybrid Machine Learning CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Curatively Resected Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Tingting Hong, Heng Zhang, Qiming Zhao, Li Liu, Jun Sun, Shudong Hu, Yong Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction in curatively resected colorectal cancer (CRC), and its performance was compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and clinical-pathological models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 794 patients with curatively resected CRC from a prospective cancer registry program were included and randomly divided into the training (n = 556) and validation (n = 238) cohorts. A radiomics signature (RS) predicting CSS was constructed with a hybrid automatic machine learning strategy, and the prognostic value was assessed with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. The performance of the established models was assessed by the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 10-feature-based RS with independent prognostic value was developed. KM survival curves showed that high-risk patients defined by RS had a worse CSS than the low-risk patients (log-rank P<0.001). The radiomics nomogram integrating the RS and clinical-pathological factors had the optimal performance in predicting CSS in terms of Harrell's concordance index (0.803 [95% confidence interval: 0.761-0.845] for the primary cohort, 0.772 [95% confidence interval: 0.702-0.841] for the validation cohort), time-dependent receiver operating curves (time-ROC) (the area under the time-ROC curves [AUC] at three years were 84.06±2.86 and at five years were 86.35±2.19 in the primary cohort, the AUC at three years were 77.6±4.76, and at five years were 84±3.66 in the validation cohort), calibration curves and decision curve analysis, in comparison with the AJCC staging model, clinical-pathological model, and the RS alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiomics nomogram integrating the RS and clinical-pathological factors could be a valuable individualized predictor of the CSS for curatively resected CRC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To develop and validate a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction in curatively resected colorectal cancer (CRC), and its performance was compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and clinical-pathological models.

Materials and methods: A total of 794 patients with curatively resected CRC from a prospective cancer registry program were included and randomly divided into the training (n = 556) and validation (n = 238) cohorts. A radiomics signature (RS) predicting CSS was constructed with a hybrid automatic machine learning strategy, and the prognostic value was assessed with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. The performance of the established models was assessed by the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results: A 10-feature-based RS with independent prognostic value was developed. KM survival curves showed that high-risk patients defined by RS had a worse CSS than the low-risk patients (log-rank P<0.001). The radiomics nomogram integrating the RS and clinical-pathological factors had the optimal performance in predicting CSS in terms of Harrell's concordance index (0.803 [95% confidence interval: 0.761-0.845] for the primary cohort, 0.772 [95% confidence interval: 0.702-0.841] for the validation cohort), time-dependent receiver operating curves (time-ROC) (the area under the time-ROC curves [AUC] at three years were 84.06±2.86 and at five years were 86.35±2.19 in the primary cohort, the AUC at three years were 77.6±4.76, and at five years were 84±3.66 in the validation cohort), calibration curves and decision curve analysis, in comparison with the AJCC staging model, clinical-pathological model, and the RS alone.

Conclusion: The radiomics nomogram integrating the RS and clinical-pathological factors could be a valuable individualized predictor of the CSS for curatively resected CRC patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信