Radiation dose at the eye lens of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2
Panatsada Awikunprasert, Jumneanphan Rueansri, Kittipong Suangamiam, Chaknarin Koedsawat, Surasak Tamon, Nattakarn Kittiva, Tanapol Dachviriyakij
{"title":"Radiation dose at the eye lens of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.","authors":"Panatsada Awikunprasert, Jumneanphan Rueansri, Kittipong Suangamiam, Chaknarin Koedsawat, Surasak Tamon, Nattakarn Kittiva, Tanapol Dachviriyakij","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear accelerator irradiation, the most common treatment for head and neck cancer, requires accurate prediction of lens radiation doses to ensure patient safety. The eye lens, being highly radiosensitive and vulnerable to scattered radiation, is at increased risk of developing cataracts. This study compared radiation doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) with those measured in vivo using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters placed on the eyes of 18 patients undergoing radiotherapy for various head and neck cancers. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between the two methods. The results showed that TPS-calculated doses were significantly higher than OSL-measured doses, with TPS values averaging twice as high. However, in three cases, the measured OSL doses exceeded the TPS predictions. The Bland-Altman plot revealed poor agreement between the two methods. The mean doses to the left and right eye lenses were 182 cGy and 170 cGy, respectively, with the highest recorded doses being 492 cGy for the left eye and 513 cGy for the right eye. Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer received the highest doses, and four patients had doses in the 3-5 Gy range, increasing their risk of cataracts. These findings emphasize the importance of validating TPS accuracy in clinical practice to ensure optimal patient care. Further research is necessary to explore the discrepancies between dose measurements and enhance TPS precision, improving clinical outcomes and patient safety in radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"366-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linear accelerator irradiation, the most common treatment for head and neck cancer, requires accurate prediction of lens radiation doses to ensure patient safety. The eye lens, being highly radiosensitive and vulnerable to scattered radiation, is at increased risk of developing cataracts. This study compared radiation doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) with those measured in vivo using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters placed on the eyes of 18 patients undergoing radiotherapy for various head and neck cancers. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between the two methods. The results showed that TPS-calculated doses were significantly higher than OSL-measured doses, with TPS values averaging twice as high. However, in three cases, the measured OSL doses exceeded the TPS predictions. The Bland-Altman plot revealed poor agreement between the two methods. The mean doses to the left and right eye lenses were 182 cGy and 170 cGy, respectively, with the highest recorded doses being 492 cGy for the left eye and 513 cGy for the right eye. Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer received the highest doses, and four patients had doses in the 3-5 Gy range, increasing their risk of cataracts. These findings emphasize the importance of validating TPS accuracy in clinical practice to ensure optimal patient care. Further research is necessary to explore the discrepancies between dose measurements and enhance TPS precision, improving clinical outcomes and patient safety in radiation therapy.

头颈癌患者接受放射治疗时晶状体处的辐射剂量。
直线加速器照射是头颈癌最常见的治疗方法,需要准确预测晶状体辐射剂量以确保患者安全。晶状体对辐射高度敏感,容易受到散射辐射的影响,因此患白内障的风险增加。本研究比较了治疗计划系统(TPS)计算的辐射剂量与放置在18名接受各种头颈部癌症放疗的患者眼睛上的光刺激发光(OSL)剂量计在体内测量的辐射剂量。使用Bland-Altman分析来评估两种方法之间的一致性。结果表明,TPS计算剂量显著高于ols测量剂量,TPS值平均高两倍。然而,在三个案例中,测量到的OSL剂量超过了TPS的预测。Bland-Altman图揭示了两种方法之间的不一致。左眼和右眼晶状体的平均剂量分别为182 cGy和170 cGy,最高记录剂量为左眼492 cGy和右眼513 cGy。鼻咽癌患者接受的剂量最高,有4名患者的剂量在3-5 Gy范围内,增加了他们患白内障的风险。这些发现强调了在临床实践中验证TPS准确性以确保最佳患者护理的重要性。需要进一步研究剂量测量之间的差异,提高TPS精度,改善放射治疗的临床结果和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信