{"title":"Management of suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia-a national survey among healthcare professionals in Sweden.","authors":"Camilla Olsson, Ellika Schalling","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2458182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigating how stroke healthcare professionals manage suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 981 professionals in Sweden was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 60% of respondents had encountered suicidality in stroke patients without aphasia, while 40% had encountered it in patients with aphasia. SLPs were more likely to meet patients with aphasia and suicidality. Routine screening was rare, while 40% reported that suicidality was assessed when needed. Psychologists, physicians, and social workers were seen as responsible for assessments, with 13% of respondents feeling it was their responsibility to assess suicidality. Less than half of those felt competent to assess patients with aphasia. Aphasia was viewed as a barrier to assessment. Uncertainty was widespread regarding intervention, particularly in patients with aphasia, and there were concerns about the competence to handle such cases when referred to psychiatry. Free-text responses highlighted a perceived lack of competence, tools, and routine procedures for handling suicidality in aphasia, alongside calls for more mental health professionals and better interprofessional collaboration regarding suicidality in stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Management of suicidality in stroke patients, particularly with aphasia, is surrounded by uncertainty. Greater competence in suicidality, aphasia-friendly communication, and improved interdisciplinary efforts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2458182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Investigating how stroke healthcare professionals manage suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 981 professionals in Sweden was conducted.
Results: Nearly 60% of respondents had encountered suicidality in stroke patients without aphasia, while 40% had encountered it in patients with aphasia. SLPs were more likely to meet patients with aphasia and suicidality. Routine screening was rare, while 40% reported that suicidality was assessed when needed. Psychologists, physicians, and social workers were seen as responsible for assessments, with 13% of respondents feeling it was their responsibility to assess suicidality. Less than half of those felt competent to assess patients with aphasia. Aphasia was viewed as a barrier to assessment. Uncertainty was widespread regarding intervention, particularly in patients with aphasia, and there were concerns about the competence to handle such cases when referred to psychiatry. Free-text responses highlighted a perceived lack of competence, tools, and routine procedures for handling suicidality in aphasia, alongside calls for more mental health professionals and better interprofessional collaboration regarding suicidality in stroke rehabilitation.
Conclusions: Management of suicidality in stroke patients, particularly with aphasia, is surrounded by uncertainty. Greater competence in suicidality, aphasia-friendly communication, and improved interdisciplinary efforts are needed.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.