Management of suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia-a national survey among healthcare professionals in Sweden.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Camilla Olsson, Ellika Schalling
{"title":"Management of suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia-a national survey among healthcare professionals in Sweden.","authors":"Camilla Olsson, Ellika Schalling","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2458182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigating how stroke healthcare professionals manage suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 981 professionals in Sweden was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 60% of respondents had encountered suicidality in stroke patients without aphasia, while 40% had encountered it in patients with aphasia. SLPs were more likely to meet patients with aphasia and suicidality. Routine screening was rare, while 40% reported that suicidality was assessed when needed. Psychologists, physicians, and social workers were seen as responsible for assessments, with 13% of respondents feeling it was their responsibility to assess suicidality. Less than half of those felt competent to assess patients with aphasia. Aphasia was viewed as a barrier to assessment. Uncertainty was widespread regarding intervention, particularly in patients with aphasia, and there were concerns about the competence to handle such cases when referred to psychiatry. Free-text responses highlighted a perceived lack of competence, tools, and routine procedures for handling suicidality in aphasia, alongside calls for more mental health professionals and better interprofessional collaboration regarding suicidality in stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Management of suicidality in stroke patients, particularly with aphasia, is surrounded by uncertainty. Greater competence in suicidality, aphasia-friendly communication, and improved interdisciplinary efforts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2458182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Investigating how stroke healthcare professionals manage suicidality in stroke patients with and without aphasia.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 981 professionals in Sweden was conducted.

Results: Nearly 60% of respondents had encountered suicidality in stroke patients without aphasia, while 40% had encountered it in patients with aphasia. SLPs were more likely to meet patients with aphasia and suicidality. Routine screening was rare, while 40% reported that suicidality was assessed when needed. Psychologists, physicians, and social workers were seen as responsible for assessments, with 13% of respondents feeling it was their responsibility to assess suicidality. Less than half of those felt competent to assess patients with aphasia. Aphasia was viewed as a barrier to assessment. Uncertainty was widespread regarding intervention, particularly in patients with aphasia, and there were concerns about the competence to handle such cases when referred to psychiatry. Free-text responses highlighted a perceived lack of competence, tools, and routine procedures for handling suicidality in aphasia, alongside calls for more mental health professionals and better interprofessional collaboration regarding suicidality in stroke rehabilitation.

Conclusions: Management of suicidality in stroke patients, particularly with aphasia, is surrounded by uncertainty. Greater competence in suicidality, aphasia-friendly communication, and improved interdisciplinary efforts are needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信