Transforming the #Enzian classification into a four-stage system: A feasibility study by comparison with the 2021 AAGL endometriosis classification.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Sebastian Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger
{"title":"Transforming the #Enzian classification into a four-stage system: A feasibility study by comparison with the 2021 AAGL endometriosis classification.","authors":"Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Sebastian Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary center in Europe.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.

Design: Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.

Setting: Tertiary center in Europe.

Participants: 222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.

Interventions: The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.

Results: The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.

Conclusion: The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信