Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1002/nur.22443
Barbara Bassola, Silvia Cilluffo, Tatiana Bolgeo, Niccolò Simonelli, Roberta Di Matteo, Alberto Dal Molin, Laura Rasero, Ercole Vellone, Maura Lusignani, Paolo Iovino
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease.","authors":"Barbara Bassola, Silvia Cilluffo, Tatiana Bolgeo, Niccolò Simonelli, Roberta Di Matteo, Alberto Dal Molin, Laura Rasero, Ercole Vellone, Maura Lusignani, Paolo Iovino","doi":"10.1002/nur.22443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Mutuality Scale in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads following a recent episode of coronary heart disease. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factory analysis. Internal consistency reliability was investigated with the model-based internal consistency reliability index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test convergent validity between mutuality and other theoretical and empirical variables associated with it. We included 150 patient-caregiver dyads (patient: mean age 65 years, 77% males, 71% married; caregiver: mean age 54 years, 21% males, 71% married). The CFA testing the theoretical four-factors (love, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) of mutuality demonstrated adequate fit to the data in both the patient and caregiver version of the scale. Reliability estimates were adequate for the whole scale (model-based internal consistency index = 0.95). Significant positive correlations were observed between mutuality and self-care behaviors, and caregiver preparedness, supporting convergent validity. The Mutuality Scale demonstrated satisfactory structural and convergent validity and reliability in patient-caregiver dyads after the onset of a coronary heart disease event.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"222-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Mutuality Scale in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads following a recent episode of coronary heart disease. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factory analysis. Internal consistency reliability was investigated with the model-based internal consistency reliability index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test convergent validity between mutuality and other theoretical and empirical variables associated with it. We included 150 patient-caregiver dyads (patient: mean age 65 years, 77% males, 71% married; caregiver: mean age 54 years, 21% males, 71% married). The CFA testing the theoretical four-factors (love, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) of mutuality demonstrated adequate fit to the data in both the patient and caregiver version of the scale. Reliability estimates were adequate for the whole scale (model-based internal consistency index = 0.95). Significant positive correlations were observed between mutuality and self-care behaviors, and caregiver preparedness, supporting convergent validity. The Mutuality Scale demonstrated satisfactory structural and convergent validity and reliability in patient-caregiver dyads after the onset of a coronary heart disease event.

冠心病发病后患者与照顾者相互关系量表的心理测量测试。
本研究调查了互惠性量表的心理测量特性在一个样本的病人-照顾者二人继最近的冠心病发作。进行了横断面分析。用验证性工厂分析检验因子效度。采用基于模型的内部一致性信度指标研究了内部一致性信度。使用Pearson相关系数来检验互性与其他相关的理论和经验变量之间的收敛效度。我们纳入了150对患者-护理者二人组(患者:平均年龄65岁,77%男性,71%已婚;照顾者:平均年龄54岁,21%男性,71%已婚)。CFA测试了相互关系的理论四个因素(爱,共同的愉快活动,共同的价值观和互惠),证明了患者和护理者版本的数据都足够适合。信度估计对整个量表是足够的(基于模型的内部一致性指数= 0.95)。互助性与自我照顾行为、照顾者准备之间存在显著正相关,支持趋同效度。相互关系量表在冠心病事件发生后的病人-照顾者二人组中显示出令人满意的结构效度和收敛效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信