Barbara Bassola, Silvia Cilluffo, Tatiana Bolgeo, Niccolò Simonelli, Roberta Di Matteo, Alberto Dal Molin, Laura Rasero, Ercole Vellone, Maura Lusignani, Paolo Iovino
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease.","authors":"Barbara Bassola, Silvia Cilluffo, Tatiana Bolgeo, Niccolò Simonelli, Roberta Di Matteo, Alberto Dal Molin, Laura Rasero, Ercole Vellone, Maura Lusignani, Paolo Iovino","doi":"10.1002/nur.22443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Mutuality Scale in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads following a recent episode of coronary heart disease. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factory analysis. Internal consistency reliability was investigated with the model-based internal consistency reliability index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test convergent validity between mutuality and other theoretical and empirical variables associated with it. We included 150 patient-caregiver dyads (patient: mean age 65 years, 77% males, 71% married; caregiver: mean age 54 years, 21% males, 71% married). The CFA testing the theoretical four-factors (love, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) of mutuality demonstrated adequate fit to the data in both the patient and caregiver version of the scale. Reliability estimates were adequate for the whole scale (model-based internal consistency index = 0.95). Significant positive correlations were observed between mutuality and self-care behaviors, and caregiver preparedness, supporting convergent validity. The Mutuality Scale demonstrated satisfactory structural and convergent validity and reliability in patient-caregiver dyads after the onset of a coronary heart disease event.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Mutuality Scale in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads following a recent episode of coronary heart disease. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factory analysis. Internal consistency reliability was investigated with the model-based internal consistency reliability index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test convergent validity between mutuality and other theoretical and empirical variables associated with it. We included 150 patient-caregiver dyads (patient: mean age 65 years, 77% males, 71% married; caregiver: mean age 54 years, 21% males, 71% married). The CFA testing the theoretical four-factors (love, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) of mutuality demonstrated adequate fit to the data in both the patient and caregiver version of the scale. Reliability estimates were adequate for the whole scale (model-based internal consistency index = 0.95). Significant positive correlations were observed between mutuality and self-care behaviors, and caregiver preparedness, supporting convergent validity. The Mutuality Scale demonstrated satisfactory structural and convergent validity and reliability in patient-caregiver dyads after the onset of a coronary heart disease event.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.