Efficacy and Safety of intravenous alteplase for unknown onset stroke on prior antiplatelet therapy: post-hoc analysis of the EOS Individual Participant Data.
Yuma Shiomi, Kaori Miwa, Märit Jensen, Manabu Inoue, Sohei Yoshimura, Naruhiko Kamogawa, Mayumi Fukuda-Doi, Henry Ma, Peter Ringleb, Ona Wu, Lee Schwamm, Stephen M Davis, Geoffrey Donnan, Christian Gerloff, Jin Nakahara, Kazunori Toyoda, Götz Thomalla, Masatoshi Koga
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of intravenous alteplase for unknown onset stroke on prior antiplatelet therapy: post-hoc analysis of the EOS Individual Participant Data.","authors":"Yuma Shiomi, Kaori Miwa, Märit Jensen, Manabu Inoue, Sohei Yoshimura, Naruhiko Kamogawa, Mayumi Fukuda-Doi, Henry Ma, Peter Ringleb, Ona Wu, Lee Schwamm, Stephen M Davis, Geoffrey Donnan, Christian Gerloff, Jin Nakahara, Kazunori Toyoda, Götz Thomalla, Masatoshi Koga","doi":"10.1177/17474930251322034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of intravenous alteplase in patients with prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) remain controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of imaging-based intravenous alteplase in patients with unknown-onset stroke with prior APT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from randomized controlled trials comparing alteplase with placebo/standard care in patients with unknown-onset acute ischemic stroke from the Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis (EOS) individual patient data meta-analysis collaboration were analyzed. Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 at 90 d poststroke. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 22-36 h and 90-d mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 780 patients had available baseline data on prior APT. Compared with the no prior APT group (n=523), the prior APT group (n=257) was older (72 years vs. 66 years) and had a higher prevalence of vascular risk factors. There was no interaction between prior APT and treatment effects of alteplase (p for interaction=0.23). In the prior APT patients, 55/125 (45%) patients in the alteplase group and 39/132 (30%) patients in the control group had a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.18-3.64]). The rates of sICH and mortality in the alteplase and control groups were 5.6% and 0.8%, respectively (aOR, 7.78 [0.94-63.37]) and 6.5% and 6.1%, respectively (aOR, 1.12 [0.38-3.36]). In the no prior APT patients, 136 patients (50%) in the alteplase group and 112 patients (45%) in the control group had a favorable outcome (aOR, 1.39 [0.94-2.05]). Safety outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (sICH: 3 [1.1%] vs. 1 [0.4%]; mortality: 13 [4.9%] vs. 3 [1.2%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alteplase has consistent efficacy regardless of prior APT in patients with unknown-onset stroke. Additionally, prior APT does not significantly increase the risk of sICH or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251322034"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251322034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The effects of intravenous alteplase in patients with prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) remain controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of imaging-based intravenous alteplase in patients with unknown-onset stroke with prior APT.
Methods: Data from randomized controlled trials comparing alteplase with placebo/standard care in patients with unknown-onset acute ischemic stroke from the Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis (EOS) individual patient data meta-analysis collaboration were analyzed. Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 at 90 d poststroke. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 22-36 h and 90-d mortality.
Results: Overall, 780 patients had available baseline data on prior APT. Compared with the no prior APT group (n=523), the prior APT group (n=257) was older (72 years vs. 66 years) and had a higher prevalence of vascular risk factors. There was no interaction between prior APT and treatment effects of alteplase (p for interaction=0.23). In the prior APT patients, 55/125 (45%) patients in the alteplase group and 39/132 (30%) patients in the control group had a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.18-3.64]). The rates of sICH and mortality in the alteplase and control groups were 5.6% and 0.8%, respectively (aOR, 7.78 [0.94-63.37]) and 6.5% and 6.1%, respectively (aOR, 1.12 [0.38-3.36]). In the no prior APT patients, 136 patients (50%) in the alteplase group and 112 patients (45%) in the control group had a favorable outcome (aOR, 1.39 [0.94-2.05]). Safety outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (sICH: 3 [1.1%] vs. 1 [0.4%]; mortality: 13 [4.9%] vs. 3 [1.2%]).
Conclusions: Alteplase has consistent efficacy regardless of prior APT in patients with unknown-onset stroke. Additionally, prior APT does not significantly increase the risk of sICH or mortality.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.