Exploring New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: genotypic vs. phenotypic insights.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Noor Ul Ain, Linzy Elton, Zahra Sadouki, Timothy D McHugh, Saba Riaz
{"title":"Exploring New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: genotypic vs. phenotypic insights.","authors":"Noor Ul Ain, Linzy Elton, Zahra Sadouki, Timothy D McHugh, Saba Riaz","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00775-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales pose a serious clinical threat, particularly in high-burden settings of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK), where rapid detection tools are essential to aid patient management. In this study, we focused on bla<sub>NDM</sub>, the most frequently reported carbapenemase in the region, and evaluated a combined phenotypic (lateral flow) and genotypic (PCR and WGS) approach for its detection. This research underscores the utility of lateral flow assays as a practical alternative to resource-intensive genotypic methods, offering a scalable solution for settings with limited laboratory capacity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-seven extensively drug-resistant strains were characterized using MALDI-TOF. Isolates were analyzed to detect Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK) using disk diffusion, MIC test, and PCR targeting bla<sub>NDM</sub>. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were analyzed and visualized using single-linkage hierarchical clustering, with results displayed on a permuted heat map. Immunochromatographic assay, RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I (Coris Bioconcept®) was used for CREK isolates [(n = 17), positive and negative)] and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing was conducted on subsets [(n = 5) bla<sub>NDM</sub>-positive co-producers of bla<sub>NDM</sub> and bla<sub>OXA</sub>, and (n = 2) bla<sub>NDM</sub>-negative bla<sub>OXA</sub> producers) to evaluate the reliability of phenotypic and genotypic tests.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Most of the XDR strains (90%) were CREK, with K. pneumoniae (71.2%) more prevalent than E. coli (28.7%) (p < 0.05). All CREK strains exhibited complete resistance (100%) to multiple antibiotics with 66% showing sensitivity to levofloxacin. Furthermore, K. pneumoniae (57.8%) had higher bla<sub>NDM</sub> gene prevalence than E. coli (36.9%). Among bla<sub>NDM</sub>-positive CREK, lateral flow assay revealed approximately half of each bacteria type co-produced bla<sub>OXA</sub> (E.coli, 52.9%), and (K. pneumoniae, 47%). For bla<sub>NDM</sub>-negative strains, bla<sub>OXA</sub> was more prevalent in K. pneumoniae (82.35%) than E. coli (41%) (p < 0.05). Comparing phenotypic to genotypic assays, E. coli showed 100% (CI 80.49 - 100%) sensitivity and specificity with a high Kappa agreement coefficient (0.91) (CI 95% 0.661-1, p < 0.01), whereas K. pneumoniae assays had lower sensitivity and specificity (40%) (CI 5.27 - 85.34%), with a lower Kappa agreement coefficient (0.20) (CI 95% 0.104-0.298, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the value of the RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I. lateral flow assay as a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for detecting bla<sub>NDM</sub> in Escherichia coli, with strong agreement to PCR and WGS. While performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae was lower, the assay offers a practical alternative in resource-limited settings, aiding antimicrobial stewardship and improving diagnostic capacities in high-burden regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00775-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales pose a serious clinical threat, particularly in high-burden settings of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK), where rapid detection tools are essential to aid patient management. In this study, we focused on blaNDM, the most frequently reported carbapenemase in the region, and evaluated a combined phenotypic (lateral flow) and genotypic (PCR and WGS) approach for its detection. This research underscores the utility of lateral flow assays as a practical alternative to resource-intensive genotypic methods, offering a scalable solution for settings with limited laboratory capacity.

Method: One hundred seventy-seven extensively drug-resistant strains were characterized using MALDI-TOF. Isolates were analyzed to detect Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK) using disk diffusion, MIC test, and PCR targeting blaNDM. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were analyzed and visualized using single-linkage hierarchical clustering, with results displayed on a permuted heat map. Immunochromatographic assay, RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I (Coris Bioconcept®) was used for CREK isolates [(n = 17), positive and negative)] and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing was conducted on subsets [(n = 5) blaNDM-positive co-producers of blaNDM and blaOXA, and (n = 2) blaNDM-negative blaOXA producers) to evaluate the reliability of phenotypic and genotypic tests.

Result: Most of the XDR strains (90%) were CREK, with K. pneumoniae (71.2%) more prevalent than E. coli (28.7%) (p < 0.05). All CREK strains exhibited complete resistance (100%) to multiple antibiotics with 66% showing sensitivity to levofloxacin. Furthermore, K. pneumoniae (57.8%) had higher blaNDM gene prevalence than E. coli (36.9%). Among blaNDM-positive CREK, lateral flow assay revealed approximately half of each bacteria type co-produced blaOXA (E.coli, 52.9%), and (K. pneumoniae, 47%). For blaNDM-negative strains, blaOXA was more prevalent in K. pneumoniae (82.35%) than E. coli (41%) (p < 0.05). Comparing phenotypic to genotypic assays, E. coli showed 100% (CI 80.49 - 100%) sensitivity and specificity with a high Kappa agreement coefficient (0.91) (CI 95% 0.661-1, p < 0.01), whereas K. pneumoniae assays had lower sensitivity and specificity (40%) (CI 5.27 - 85.34%), with a lower Kappa agreement coefficient (0.20) (CI 95% 0.104-0.298, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the value of the RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I. lateral flow assay as a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for detecting blaNDM in Escherichia coli, with strong agreement to PCR and WGS. While performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae was lower, the assay offers a practical alternative in resource-limited settings, aiding antimicrobial stewardship and improving diagnostic capacities in high-burden regions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信