Exploring New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: genotypic vs. phenotypic insights.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Noor Ul Ain, Linzy Elton, Zahra Sadouki, Timothy D McHugh, Saba Riaz
{"title":"Exploring New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: genotypic vs. phenotypic insights.","authors":"Noor Ul Ain, Linzy Elton, Zahra Sadouki, Timothy D McHugh, Saba Riaz","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00775-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales pose a serious clinical threat, particularly in high-burden settings of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK), where rapid detection tools are essential to aid patient management. In this study, we focused on bla<sub>NDM</sub>, the most frequently reported carbapenemase in the region, and evaluated a combined phenotypic (lateral flow) and genotypic (PCR and WGS) approach for its detection. This research underscores the utility of lateral flow assays as a practical alternative to resource-intensive genotypic methods, offering a scalable solution for settings with limited laboratory capacity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-seven extensively drug-resistant strains were characterized using MALDI-TOF. Isolates were analyzed to detect Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK) using disk diffusion, MIC test, and PCR targeting bla<sub>NDM</sub>. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were analyzed and visualized using single-linkage hierarchical clustering, with results displayed on a permuted heat map. Immunochromatographic assay, RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I (Coris Bioconcept®) was used for CREK isolates [(n = 17), positive and negative)] and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing was conducted on subsets [(n = 5) bla<sub>NDM</sub>-positive co-producers of bla<sub>NDM</sub> and bla<sub>OXA</sub>, and (n = 2) bla<sub>NDM</sub>-negative bla<sub>OXA</sub> producers) to evaluate the reliability of phenotypic and genotypic tests.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Most of the XDR strains (90%) were CREK, with K. pneumoniae (71.2%) more prevalent than E. coli (28.7%) (p < 0.05). All CREK strains exhibited complete resistance (100%) to multiple antibiotics with 66% showing sensitivity to levofloxacin. Furthermore, K. pneumoniae (57.8%) had higher bla<sub>NDM</sub> gene prevalence than E. coli (36.9%). Among bla<sub>NDM</sub>-positive CREK, lateral flow assay revealed approximately half of each bacteria type co-produced bla<sub>OXA</sub> (E.coli, 52.9%), and (K. pneumoniae, 47%). For bla<sub>NDM</sub>-negative strains, bla<sub>OXA</sub> was more prevalent in K. pneumoniae (82.35%) than E. coli (41%) (p < 0.05). Comparing phenotypic to genotypic assays, E. coli showed 100% (CI 80.49 - 100%) sensitivity and specificity with a high Kappa agreement coefficient (0.91) (CI 95% 0.661-1, p < 0.01), whereas K. pneumoniae assays had lower sensitivity and specificity (40%) (CI 5.27 - 85.34%), with a lower Kappa agreement coefficient (0.20) (CI 95% 0.104-0.298, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the value of the RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I. lateral flow assay as a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for detecting bla<sub>NDM</sub> in Escherichia coli, with strong agreement to PCR and WGS. While performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae was lower, the assay offers a practical alternative in resource-limited settings, aiding antimicrobial stewardship and improving diagnostic capacities in high-burden regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00775-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales pose a serious clinical threat, particularly in high-burden settings of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK), where rapid detection tools are essential to aid patient management. In this study, we focused on blaNDM, the most frequently reported carbapenemase in the region, and evaluated a combined phenotypic (lateral flow) and genotypic (PCR and WGS) approach for its detection. This research underscores the utility of lateral flow assays as a practical alternative to resource-intensive genotypic methods, offering a scalable solution for settings with limited laboratory capacity.

Method: One hundred seventy-seven extensively drug-resistant strains were characterized using MALDI-TOF. Isolates were analyzed to detect Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK) using disk diffusion, MIC test, and PCR targeting blaNDM. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were analyzed and visualized using single-linkage hierarchical clustering, with results displayed on a permuted heat map. Immunochromatographic assay, RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I (Coris Bioconcept®) was used for CREK isolates [(n = 17), positive and negative)] and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing was conducted on subsets [(n = 5) blaNDM-positive co-producers of blaNDM and blaOXA, and (n = 2) blaNDM-negative blaOXA producers) to evaluate the reliability of phenotypic and genotypic tests.

Result: Most of the XDR strains (90%) were CREK, with K. pneumoniae (71.2%) more prevalent than E. coli (28.7%) (p < 0.05). All CREK strains exhibited complete resistance (100%) to multiple antibiotics with 66% showing sensitivity to levofloxacin. Furthermore, K. pneumoniae (57.8%) had higher blaNDM gene prevalence than E. coli (36.9%). Among blaNDM-positive CREK, lateral flow assay revealed approximately half of each bacteria type co-produced blaOXA (E.coli, 52.9%), and (K. pneumoniae, 47%). For blaNDM-negative strains, blaOXA was more prevalent in K. pneumoniae (82.35%) than E. coli (41%) (p < 0.05). Comparing phenotypic to genotypic assays, E. coli showed 100% (CI 80.49 - 100%) sensitivity and specificity with a high Kappa agreement coefficient (0.91) (CI 95% 0.661-1, p < 0.01), whereas K. pneumoniae assays had lower sensitivity and specificity (40%) (CI 5.27 - 85.34%), with a lower Kappa agreement coefficient (0.20) (CI 95% 0.104-0.298, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the value of the RESIST-5 O.K.N.V.I. lateral flow assay as a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for detecting blaNDM in Escherichia coli, with strong agreement to PCR and WGS. While performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae was lower, the assay offers a practical alternative in resource-limited settings, aiding antimicrobial stewardship and improving diagnostic capacities in high-burden regions.

探索肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌中的新德里金属β -内酰胺酶:基因型与表型的见解。
背景:产碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌构成严重的临床威胁,特别是在碳青霉烯耐药大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌(CREK)的高负担环境中,快速检测工具对帮助患者管理至关重要。在本研究中,我们重点关注该地区最常报道的碳青霉烯酶blaNDM,并评估了表型(侧流)和基因型(PCR和WGS)相结合的检测方法。这项研究强调了横向流动分析作为资源密集型基因型方法的实用替代方案的实用性,为实验室能力有限的环境提供了可扩展的解决方案。方法:采用MALDI-TOF对177株广泛耐药菌株进行鉴定。采用圆盘扩散法、MIC法和PCR法检测耐碳青霉烯型大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌(CREK)。使用单链接分层聚类分析和可视化抗生素敏感性模式,结果显示在排列热图上。免疫层析法,resistance -5 o.k.n.v i (Coris Bioconcept®)用于CREK分离株[(n = 17),阳性和阴性)],并对亚群[(n = 5) blaNDM阳性的blaNDM和blaOXA的共同生产者,(n = 2) blaNDM阴性的blaOXA生产者)进行Oxford Nanopore测序,以评估表型和基因型测试的可靠性。结果:绝大多数XDR菌株(90%)为CREK,其中肺炎克雷伯菌(71.2%)高于大肠杆菌(28.7%),NDM基因患病率高于大肠杆菌(36.9%)。在blandm阳性的CREK中,横向流动试验显示每种细菌类型约有一半共同产生blaOXA(大肠杆菌,52.9%)和肺炎克雷伯菌,47%)。在blaNDM阴性菌株中,blaOXA在肺炎克雷伯菌中的流行率(82.35%)高于大肠杆菌(41%)(p)。结论:本研究证明了resistance -5 O.K.N.V.I.横向流动法检测大肠杆菌blaNDM是一种快速可靠的诊断工具,与PCR和WGS具有很强的一致性。虽然对肺炎克雷伯菌的检测效果较低,但该检测方法在资源有限的环境中提供了一种实用的替代方法,有助于抗菌剂管理并提高高负担地区的诊断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信