A dyadic stress induction tool for experimental investigation of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Youngmee Kim, Charles S Carver, Thomas C Tsai, Amanda Ting, David Spiegel
{"title":"A dyadic stress induction tool for experimental investigation of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.","authors":"Youngmee Kim, Charles S Carver, Thomas C Tsai, Amanda Ting, David Spiegel","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical illnesses are major stressors not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers, yet existing tools are inadequate to assess mechanistic response patterns to such stressors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to validate a stress induction task that pertains to close relationships and health-related concerns with adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 123, 56 years old, 34% female, 60% Hispanic, 6.5 months post-diagnosis) and their family caregivers (55 years old, 66% female, 59% Hispanic) underwent an experimental session during which both individuals imagined a scenario where one person is hit by a car (patient) and the partner (caregiver) has no means to provide or seek out help for the victim. The session consisted of 6 phases: baseline, scenario provision, speech preparation, speech by caregiver, speech by patient, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of general linear modeling with repeated measures revealed that the task induced significant affective, stress, and cardiovascular responses in both patients and caregivers. Stress reactivity and recovery patterns, however, varied by patients versus caregivers, stress induction phases, and the types of assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest the newly developed stress task as an acceptable tool for studying stress regulation in medical and family contexts. With further validation, this tool may help identify psychological and physiological pathways to improve the stress coping outcomes of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7939,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaf005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical illnesses are major stressors not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers, yet existing tools are inadequate to assess mechanistic response patterns to such stressors.

Purpose: We sought to validate a stress induction task that pertains to close relationships and health-related concerns with adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.

Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 123, 56 years old, 34% female, 60% Hispanic, 6.5 months post-diagnosis) and their family caregivers (55 years old, 66% female, 59% Hispanic) underwent an experimental session during which both individuals imagined a scenario where one person is hit by a car (patient) and the partner (caregiver) has no means to provide or seek out help for the victim. The session consisted of 6 phases: baseline, scenario provision, speech preparation, speech by caregiver, speech by patient, and recovery.

Results: Results of general linear modeling with repeated measures revealed that the task induced significant affective, stress, and cardiovascular responses in both patients and caregivers. Stress reactivity and recovery patterns, however, varied by patients versus caregivers, stress induction phases, and the types of assessment.

Conclusions: Findings suggest the newly developed stress task as an acceptable tool for studying stress regulation in medical and family contexts. With further validation, this tool may help identify psychological and physiological pathways to improve the stress coping outcomes of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.

一种用于成年癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的二元应激诱导工具的实验研究。
背景:医学疾病不仅是患者的主要压力源,也是他们的家庭照顾者的主要压力源,然而现有的工具不足以评估对这些压力源的机制反应模式。目的:我们试图验证与成年癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的密切关系和健康相关的压力诱导任务。方法:新诊断为结直肠癌的患者(n = 123, 56岁,34%女性,60%西班牙裔,诊断后6.5个月)及其家庭照顾者(55岁,66%女性,59%西班牙裔)进行了一项实验,在此过程中,两个人都想象一个场景:一个人被车撞了(患者),伴侣(照顾者)没有办法为受害者提供或寻求帮助。会议包括6个阶段:基线,场景提供,演讲准备,护理人员演讲,患者演讲和康复。结果:重复测量的一般线性模型结果显示,任务在患者和护理人员中引起了显着的情感,压力和心血管反应。然而,应激反应和恢复模式因患者与护理者、应激诱导阶段和评估类型而异。结论:研究结果表明,新开发的压力任务是研究医学和家庭环境下压力调节的一个可接受的工具。通过进一步验证,该工具可能有助于确定心理和生理途径,以改善成年癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的压力应对结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Annals of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Annals of Behavioral Medicine aims to foster the exchange of knowledge derived from the disciplines involved in the field of behavioral medicine, and the integration of biological, psychosocial, and behavioral factors and principles as they relate to such areas as health promotion, disease prevention, risk factor modification, disease progression, adjustment and adaptation to physical disorders, and rehabilitation. To achieve these goals, much of the journal is devoted to the publication of original empirical articles including reports of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or other basic and clinical investigations. Integrative reviews of the evidence for the application of behavioral interventions in health care will also be provided. .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信