Video laryngoscopy for obstetric airway management: A narrative review

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Fernanda S.L. Oliveira, Fabricio B. Zasso, Kevin S. Chen, Kong Eric You-Ten, Naveed Siddiqui
{"title":"Video laryngoscopy for obstetric airway management: A narrative review","authors":"Fernanda S.L. Oliveira,&nbsp;Fabricio B. Zasso,&nbsp;Kevin S. Chen,&nbsp;Kong Eric You-Ten,&nbsp;Naveed Siddiqui","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The obstetric population has an increased risk of difficult airways due to changes, with a mortality rate of 1 death per 90 failed intubations. Recently guidelines for difficult airway management have recognized and recommended video laryngoscopy devices in difficult airway cases. Although there has been a substantial number of publications on video laryngoscopy, there is a lack of literature to help establish its use for managing obstetric airways. Therefore, we conducted a narrative review to evaluate the performance and efficacy of video laryngoscopy in obstetric patients. A literature review was performed on papers published until November 2024, studying adult patients who underwent obstetric procedures under general anesthesia. Improved glottis visualization, increased success rate in patients with predicted difficult airways, and rescue of a failed direct laryngoscopy attempt are advantages of video laryngoscopy. There are conflicting results regarding video laryngoscopy being superior to direct laryngoscopy regarding first-attempt success and time to intubation. Additionally, we discussed different types of video laryngoscope blades and video laryngoscopy with training in the obstetric population. Our review's findings are consistent with the current guidelines that recommend video laryngoscopes should be available for every obstetric general anesthesia, summed to the need for larger studies in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The obstetric population has an increased risk of difficult airways due to changes, with a mortality rate of 1 death per 90 failed intubations. Recently guidelines for difficult airway management have recognized and recommended video laryngoscopy devices in difficult airway cases. Although there has been a substantial number of publications on video laryngoscopy, there is a lack of literature to help establish its use for managing obstetric airways. Therefore, we conducted a narrative review to evaluate the performance and efficacy of video laryngoscopy in obstetric patients. A literature review was performed on papers published until November 2024, studying adult patients who underwent obstetric procedures under general anesthesia. Improved glottis visualization, increased success rate in patients with predicted difficult airways, and rescue of a failed direct laryngoscopy attempt are advantages of video laryngoscopy. There are conflicting results regarding video laryngoscopy being superior to direct laryngoscopy regarding first-attempt success and time to intubation. Additionally, we discussed different types of video laryngoscope blades and video laryngoscopy with training in the obstetric population. Our review's findings are consistent with the current guidelines that recommend video laryngoscopes should be available for every obstetric general anesthesia, summed to the need for larger studies in this population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信