Effect of sacral mobilization (repositioning) on shoulder abduction range of motion restriction “Case Report”

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Pezhman Masoudi , Zahra Naqavi , Arash Tahamtan , Gholamhasan Mirzayi
{"title":"Effect of sacral mobilization (repositioning) on shoulder abduction range of motion restriction “Case Report”","authors":"Pezhman Masoudi ,&nbsp;Zahra Naqavi ,&nbsp;Arash Tahamtan ,&nbsp;Gholamhasan Mirzayi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluates the impact of sacral mobilization on restricted shoulder abduction Range of Motion (ROM), examining potential connections between sacral dysfunction and scapular mobility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two participants with sacral dysfunctions and limited shoulder abduction ROM were evaluated for active and passive ROM before and after sacral mobilization. One participant had lumbar pain, while the other had previously undergone surgery for a humeral greater tubercle fracture. During assessment, participants stood in front of a scaled wall and performed active shoulder abduction in the frontal plane, with their torso and pelvis stabilized using a barbell squat setup to prevent additional movements in the thoracic and lumbar regions. For passive ROM, a 10 kg weight attached to a pulley system was used to assist full abduction. Six ROM measurements were recorded across three sessions for each participant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Active ROM increased in both participants following sacral mobilization across the three sessions. Passive ROM showed significant improvement in the participant with lumbar pain, while the surgical participant demonstrated modest gains within each session and notable improvements over the three sessions. Abduction strength progressively increased across sessions for the participant with low back pain. In contrast, the surgical participant experienced an increase in strength within each session, but it returned to baseline by the next session.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that sacral dysfunction may contribute to restricted scapular movement. The observed improvements in ROM and strength indicate potential muscular and fascial connections between segments, as well as possible alterations in muscular activation following sacral mobilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 751-755"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluates the impact of sacral mobilization on restricted shoulder abduction Range of Motion (ROM), examining potential connections between sacral dysfunction and scapular mobility.

Methods

Two participants with sacral dysfunctions and limited shoulder abduction ROM were evaluated for active and passive ROM before and after sacral mobilization. One participant had lumbar pain, while the other had previously undergone surgery for a humeral greater tubercle fracture. During assessment, participants stood in front of a scaled wall and performed active shoulder abduction in the frontal plane, with their torso and pelvis stabilized using a barbell squat setup to prevent additional movements in the thoracic and lumbar regions. For passive ROM, a 10 kg weight attached to a pulley system was used to assist full abduction. Six ROM measurements were recorded across three sessions for each participant.

Results

Active ROM increased in both participants following sacral mobilization across the three sessions. Passive ROM showed significant improvement in the participant with lumbar pain, while the surgical participant demonstrated modest gains within each session and notable improvements over the three sessions. Abduction strength progressively increased across sessions for the participant with low back pain. In contrast, the surgical participant experienced an increase in strength within each session, but it returned to baseline by the next session.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that sacral dysfunction may contribute to restricted scapular movement. The observed improvements in ROM and strength indicate potential muscular and fascial connections between segments, as well as possible alterations in muscular activation following sacral mobilization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信