National Football League Scouting Combine Test Results of Elite-Level National Football League Players.

David A LaPlaca, Bryan A McCullick
{"title":"National Football League Scouting Combine Test Results of Elite-Level National Football League Players.","authors":"David A LaPlaca, Bryan A McCullick","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2448827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine elite and poor performance for each offensive and defensive position group on every physical test performed at the NFL Scouting Combine Descriptive statistics were calculated as well as independent samples t-tests for the 15 position groups relative to their performance in the NFL Scouting Combine tests, including: (a) 40-yard Dash, (b) Vertical Jump, (c) Bench Press, (d) Broad Jump, (e) Three-cone Drill, and (f) Shuttle Run. Each player's height and weight were also analyzed. The 15 position groups include Quarterbacks (<i>n</i> = 206), Fullbacks (<i>n</i> = 64), Running Backs (<i>n</i> = 314), Wide Receivers (<i>n</i> = 501), Tight Ends (<i>n</i> = 187), Offensive Tackles (<i>n</i> = 279), Guards (<i>n</i> = 198), Centers (<i>n</i> = 99), Cornerbacks (<i>n</i> = 374), Free Safeties (<i>n</i> = 132), Strong Safeties (<i>n</i> = 129), Outside Linebackers (<i>n</i> = 273), Inside Linebackers (<i>n</i> = 162), Defensive Ends (<i>n</i> = 280), and Defensive Tackles (<i>n</i> = 273). For each of the 15 position groups, there was at least one NFL Scouting Combine test result that had a statistically significant difference at the <i>p</i> < .05 or <i>p</i> < .001 level when comparing players who averaged playing in at least 10 games per season versus those that played in less than 10 games. The results of this study provide knowledge of which physical test is essential for each offensive and defensive position and can be helpful for those charged with making player personnel decisions in NFL organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2448827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine elite and poor performance for each offensive and defensive position group on every physical test performed at the NFL Scouting Combine Descriptive statistics were calculated as well as independent samples t-tests for the 15 position groups relative to their performance in the NFL Scouting Combine tests, including: (a) 40-yard Dash, (b) Vertical Jump, (c) Bench Press, (d) Broad Jump, (e) Three-cone Drill, and (f) Shuttle Run. Each player's height and weight were also analyzed. The 15 position groups include Quarterbacks (n = 206), Fullbacks (n = 64), Running Backs (n = 314), Wide Receivers (n = 501), Tight Ends (n = 187), Offensive Tackles (n = 279), Guards (n = 198), Centers (n = 99), Cornerbacks (n = 374), Free Safeties (n = 132), Strong Safeties (n = 129), Outside Linebackers (n = 273), Inside Linebackers (n = 162), Defensive Ends (n = 280), and Defensive Tackles (n = 273). For each of the 15 position groups, there was at least one NFL Scouting Combine test result that had a statistically significant difference at the p < .05 or p < .001 level when comparing players who averaged playing in at least 10 games per season versus those that played in less than 10 games. The results of this study provide knowledge of which physical test is essential for each offensive and defensive position and can be helpful for those charged with making player personnel decisions in NFL organizations.

国家橄榄球联盟精英球员球探组合测试结果。
本研究旨在确定每个进攻和防守位置组在NFL球探联合测试中进行的每项体能测试中的优秀和较差表现,并对15个位置组相对于他们在NFL球探联合测试中的表现进行描述性统计和独立样本t检验,包括:(a) 40码冲刺,(b)垂直跳跃,(c)卧推,(d)跳远,(e)三锥训练和(f)梭子跑。每个球员的身高和体重也被分析。这15个位置组包括四分卫(n = 206)、后卫(n = 64)、跑卫(n = 314)、外接球手(n = 501)、近端锋(n = 187)、进攻截锋(n = 279)、后卫(n = 198)、中锋(n = 99)、角卫(n = 374)、自由后卫(n = 132)、强力后卫(n = 129)、外线后卫(n = 273)、内线后卫(n = 162)、防守端锋(n = 280)和防守截锋(n = 273)。对于15个位置组中的每一个,至少有一个NFL球探联合测试结果在p p上具有统计学显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信