The efficacy of Mulligan mobilization and corticosteroid injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"The efficacy of Mulligan mobilization and corticosteroid injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Burak Menek, Merve Yilmaz Menek","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of rotator cuff (RTC) tears commonly involves manual therapy, exercise, and injection methods. These treatments are typically administered together as components of a physical therapy intervention. However, it is not known which intervention is more effective.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the impact of mobilization with movement (MWM) mobilization, a technique from Mulligan approaches, and corticosteroid (CS) injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in cases of RTC tears.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with RTC tears (n = 60) were divided into Mulligan mobilization (MM) and CS groups. The participants in the MM group performed mobilization with movement and a conventional exercise program; the CS group received a CS injection in addition to conventional exercises. The Visual Analog Scale, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, active range of motion (AROM), and joint position sense (JPS) were evaluated. The outcomes were analyzed using effect size, minimum clinically important difference, minimal detectable change, Wilcoxon test, and Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly improved in all measured outcomes at 3 weeks. The MM group showed significantly better (p < 0.05, Cohen d range 0.82-3.2) results in pain, AROM (Flexion, abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation), and proprioception (30° and 60° of flexion and abduction). Between-group differences in AROM were also clinically meaningful as they exceeded their MDC<sub>90</sub> and minimum clinically important difference values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both of these treatment methods may be successful in the short-term management of chronic RTC, the MM approach combined with conventional exercises seems to be a more effective approach for improving shoulder pain, function, and proprioception in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>NCT05933382.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Treatment of rotator cuff (RTC) tears commonly involves manual therapy, exercise, and injection methods. These treatments are typically administered together as components of a physical therapy intervention. However, it is not known which intervention is more effective.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of mobilization with movement (MWM) mobilization, a technique from Mulligan approaches, and corticosteroid (CS) injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in cases of RTC tears.
Study design: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.
Methods: Participants with RTC tears (n = 60) were divided into Mulligan mobilization (MM) and CS groups. The participants in the MM group performed mobilization with movement and a conventional exercise program; the CS group received a CS injection in addition to conventional exercises. The Visual Analog Scale, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, active range of motion (AROM), and joint position sense (JPS) were evaluated. The outcomes were analyzed using effect size, minimum clinically important difference, minimal detectable change, Wilcoxon test, and Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: Both groups significantly improved in all measured outcomes at 3 weeks. The MM group showed significantly better (p < 0.05, Cohen d range 0.82-3.2) results in pain, AROM (Flexion, abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation), and proprioception (30° and 60° of flexion and abduction). Between-group differences in AROM were also clinically meaningful as they exceeded their MDC90 and minimum clinically important difference values.
Conclusions: Although both of these treatment methods may be successful in the short-term management of chronic RTC, the MM approach combined with conventional exercises seems to be a more effective approach for improving shoulder pain, function, and proprioception in this patient population.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
