Chewing with Co-Cr or PEEK denture frameworks: A randomized crossover clinical study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pedro Henrique Bastos de Oliveira, Guilherme Fantini Ferreira, Lorena Tavares Gama, Talita Malini Carletti, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia
{"title":"Chewing with Co-Cr or PEEK denture frameworks: A randomized crossover clinical study.","authors":"Pedro Henrique Bastos de Oliveira, Guilherme Fantini Ferreira, Lorena Tavares Gama, Talita Malini Carletti, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare masticatory function and patient satisfaction with removable partial dentures (RPDs) with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and injected polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks, respectively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve volunteers (7 women, 5 men; mean age, 56.6 years) with complete maxillary edentulism and partial mandibular edentulism (Kennedy Class I) first received new RPDs with PEEK (experimental group) or Co-Cr (control group) frameworks and used them for 2 months. Masticatory performance (MP) was evaluated using sieves and Optocal, with results expressed as the mean particle size (X<sub>50</sub>); maximum bite force (MBF) was measured with a force transducer and pressure sensors; and self-reported satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. After the initial evaluation, a 1-week washout period was followed by group crossover and reassessment after an additional 2 months. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>X<sub>50</sub> values were lower for RPDs with Co-Cr frameworks than for those with PEEK frameworks (p = 0.007), indicating better MP. The MBF did not differ significantly between RPD framework types. Participants' satisfaction, in terms of prosthesis stability (p = 0.02) and chewing ability (p < 0.001), was greater for Co-Cr RPDs. Most participants preferred to continue using Co-Cr frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPDs with injected PEEK frameworks were associated with reduced MP and patient satisfaction relative to Co-Cr frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare masticatory function and patient satisfaction with removable partial dentures (RPDs) with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and injected polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks, respectively.

Materials and methods: Twelve volunteers (7 women, 5 men; mean age, 56.6 years) with complete maxillary edentulism and partial mandibular edentulism (Kennedy Class I) first received new RPDs with PEEK (experimental group) or Co-Cr (control group) frameworks and used them for 2 months. Masticatory performance (MP) was evaluated using sieves and Optocal, with results expressed as the mean particle size (X50); maximum bite force (MBF) was measured with a force transducer and pressure sensors; and self-reported satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. After the initial evaluation, a 1-week washout period was followed by group crossover and reassessment after an additional 2 months. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests (α = 5%).

Results: X50 values were lower for RPDs with Co-Cr frameworks than for those with PEEK frameworks (p = 0.007), indicating better MP. The MBF did not differ significantly between RPD framework types. Participants' satisfaction, in terms of prosthesis stability (p = 0.02) and chewing ability (p < 0.001), was greater for Co-Cr RPDs. Most participants preferred to continue using Co-Cr frameworks.

Conclusions: RPDs with injected PEEK frameworks were associated with reduced MP and patient satisfaction relative to Co-Cr frameworks.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信