The influence of prestroke disability on outcome in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score who underwent endovascular thrombectomy.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hidetoshi Matsukawa, Kazutaka Uchida, Sameh Samir Elawady, Conor Cunningham, Mohammad-Mahdi Sowlat, Ilko Maier, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Ansaar Rai, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Edgar A Samaniego, Adam S Arthur, Shinichi Yoshimura, Hugo Cuellar-Saenz, Jonathan A Grossberg, Ali Alawieh, Daniele G Romano, Omar Tanweer, Justin Mascitelli, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Joshua Osbun, Roberto Crosa, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Michael R Levitt, Waleed Brinjikji, Mark Moss, Richard Williamson, Pedro Navia, Peter Kan, Reade De Leacy, Shakeel Chowdhry, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Alejandro M Spiotta
{"title":"The influence of prestroke disability on outcome in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score who underwent endovascular thrombectomy.","authors":"Hidetoshi Matsukawa, Kazutaka Uchida, Sameh Samir Elawady, Conor Cunningham, Mohammad-Mahdi Sowlat, Ilko Maier, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Ansaar Rai, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Edgar A Samaniego, Adam S Arthur, Shinichi Yoshimura, Hugo Cuellar-Saenz, Jonathan A Grossberg, Ali Alawieh, Daniele G Romano, Omar Tanweer, Justin Mascitelli, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Joshua Osbun, Roberto Crosa, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Michael R Levitt, Waleed Brinjikji, Mark Moss, Richard Williamson, Pedro Navia, Peter Kan, Reade De Leacy, Shakeel Chowdhry, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Alejandro M Spiotta","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS24888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The definitive influence of prestroke disability on outcomes in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prestroke disability on outcomes in this specific population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 32 international centers for AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who underwent EVT between January 2013 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Low ASPECTS and prestroke disability were defined as ASPECTS values of 2-5 and prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2. The primary outcome was a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were independent ambulation (mRS scores of 0-3) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, good functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-2) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, successful recanalization, and 90-day mortality. Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as an intracranial hemorrhage with an associated worsening of ≥ 4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without prestroke disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 293 patients, 50 (17.1%) had a prestroke disability. Of 50 patients, 20 (40.0%), 24 (48.0%), and 6 (12.0%) had prestroke mRS scores of 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The primary outcome showed no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with patients without prestroke disability, those with prestroke disability had a significantly smaller proportion of independent ambulation or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.53) and good functional outcome or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.91). Other secondary and safety outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study indicated that prestroke disability was not associated with a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days or intracranial hemorrhage. Physicians should not routinely exclude AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who have prestroke disability from EVT based on prestroke disability alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS24888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The definitive influence of prestroke disability on outcomes in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prestroke disability on outcomes in this specific population.

Methods: Data from 32 international centers for AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who underwent EVT between January 2013 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Low ASPECTS and prestroke disability were defined as ASPECTS values of 2-5 and prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2. The primary outcome was a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were independent ambulation (mRS scores of 0-3) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, good functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-2) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, successful recanalization, and 90-day mortality. Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as an intracranial hemorrhage with an associated worsening of ≥ 4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without prestroke disability.

Results: Of 293 patients, 50 (17.1%) had a prestroke disability. Of 50 patients, 20 (40.0%), 24 (48.0%), and 6 (12.0%) had prestroke mRS scores of 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The primary outcome showed no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with patients without prestroke disability, those with prestroke disability had a significantly smaller proportion of independent ambulation or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.53) and good functional outcome or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.91). Other secondary and safety outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: The present study indicated that prestroke disability was not associated with a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days or intracranial hemorrhage. Physicians should not routinely exclude AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who have prestroke disability from EVT based on prestroke disability alone.

目的:对于因大血管闭塞(LVO)导致急性缺血性卒中(AIS)而接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗的阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期 CT 评分(ASPECTS)较低的患者,卒中前残疾对其预后的确切影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查卒中前残疾对这一特殊人群预后的影响:回顾性分析了来自32个国际中心、在2013年1月至2022年12月期间接受EVT的低ASPECTS AIS-LVO患者的数据。低ASPECTS和卒中前残疾定义为ASPECTS值为2-5,卒中前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≥2。主要结果是 90 天后恢复到卒中前的 mRS 评分。次要结果为独立行走(mRS 评分为 0-3 分)或 90 天后恢复到卒中前的 mRS 评分、良好的功能结果(mRS 评分为 0-2 分)或 90 天后恢复到卒中前的 mRS 评分、成功再通血管以及 90 天死亡率。安全性结果为任何颅内出血或无症状颅内出血。无症状性颅内出血是指颅内出血伴有美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分恶化≥4分。对卒中前致残和卒中后未致残患者的结果进行了比较:在 293 名患者中,有 50 人(17.1%)在卒中前致残。在这 50 名患者中,分别有 20 人(40.0%)、24 人(48.0%)和 6 人(12.0%)在卒中前的 mRS 评分为 2 分、3 分和 4 分。两组患者的主要结果无明显差异。与脑卒中前无残疾的患者相比,脑卒中前有残疾的患者独立行走或恢复到脑卒中前mRS评分的比例明显较小(调整后OR为0.13,95% CI为0.03-0.53),功能结果良好或恢复到脑卒中前mRS评分的比例也明显较小(调整后OR为0.21,95% CI为0.05-0.91)。其他次要和安全性结果显示,两组间无明显差异:本研究表明,卒中前残疾与卒中前90天恢复mRS评分或颅内出血无关。医生不应仅根据卒中前的残疾情况,就将 ASPECTS 较低且卒中前残疾的 AIS-LVO 患者从 EVT 中排除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信