Personalized intraoperative arterial pressure management and mitochondrial oxygen tension in patients having major non-cardiac surgery: a pilot substudy of the IMPROVE trial.
Moritz Flick, Christina Vokuhl, Alina Bergholz, Kristina Boutchkova, Julia Y Nicklas, Bernd Saugel
{"title":"Personalized intraoperative arterial pressure management and mitochondrial oxygen tension in patients having major non-cardiac surgery: a pilot substudy of the IMPROVE trial.","authors":"Moritz Flick, Christina Vokuhl, Alina Bergholz, Kristina Boutchkova, Julia Y Nicklas, Bernd Saugel","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01260-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"Cellular Oxygen METabolism\" (COMET) system (Photonics Healthcare, Utrecht, The Netherlands) non-invasively measures mitochondrial oxygen tension (mitoPO<sub>2</sub>) in the skin. The effects of general anesthesia and major non-cardiac surgery on mitoPO<sub>2</sub> remain unknown. In this pre-planned pilot substudy of the \"Intraoperative blood pressure Management based on the individual blood PRessure profile: impact on postOperatiVE organ function\" (IMPROVE) trial, we measured mitoPO<sub>2</sub> from induction of general anesthesia until the end of surgery in 19 major non-cardiac surgery patients (10 assigned to personalized and 9 to routine intraoperative arterial pressure management). In the overall cohort, the median (25th to 75th percentile) preoperative awake mitoPO<sub>2</sub> was 63 (53 to 82) mmHg and mitoPO<sub>2</sub> after induction of general anesthesia was 42 (35 to 59) mmHg. The intraoperative average mitoPO<sub>2</sub> was 39 (30 to 50) mmHg. Thirteen patients (68%) had intraoperative mitoPO<sub>2</sub> values below 20 mmHg and the median percentage of surgical time with mitoPO<sub>2</sub> < 20 mmHg was 17 (0 to 31)%. MitoPO<sub>2</sub> was weakly correlated with mean arterial pressure (repeated measures correlation (r<sub>rm</sub>(n); r<sub>rm</sub>(984) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.32; P < 0.001), but not meaningfully with heart rate (r<sub>rm</sub>(984) = -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.11 to 0.01; P = 0.117). There was no important difference in intraoperative average mitoPO<sub>2</sub> between patients assigned to personalized or to routine intraoperative arterial pressure management (P = 0.653). MitoPO<sub>2</sub> under general anesthesia was about a quarter lower than preoperative awake mitoPO<sub>2</sub>, substantially fluctuated during major non-cardiac surgery, and transiently decreased below 20 mmHg in about two-thirds of the patients. Personalized - compared to routine - intraoperative arterial pressure management did not increase intraoperative mitoPO<sub>2</sub>. Whether intraoperative decreases in mitoPO<sub>2</sub> are clinically meaningful warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01260-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The "Cellular Oxygen METabolism" (COMET) system (Photonics Healthcare, Utrecht, The Netherlands) non-invasively measures mitochondrial oxygen tension (mitoPO2) in the skin. The effects of general anesthesia and major non-cardiac surgery on mitoPO2 remain unknown. In this pre-planned pilot substudy of the "Intraoperative blood pressure Management based on the individual blood PRessure profile: impact on postOperatiVE organ function" (IMPROVE) trial, we measured mitoPO2 from induction of general anesthesia until the end of surgery in 19 major non-cardiac surgery patients (10 assigned to personalized and 9 to routine intraoperative arterial pressure management). In the overall cohort, the median (25th to 75th percentile) preoperative awake mitoPO2 was 63 (53 to 82) mmHg and mitoPO2 after induction of general anesthesia was 42 (35 to 59) mmHg. The intraoperative average mitoPO2 was 39 (30 to 50) mmHg. Thirteen patients (68%) had intraoperative mitoPO2 values below 20 mmHg and the median percentage of surgical time with mitoPO2 < 20 mmHg was 17 (0 to 31)%. MitoPO2 was weakly correlated with mean arterial pressure (repeated measures correlation (rrm(n); rrm(984) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.32; P < 0.001), but not meaningfully with heart rate (rrm(984) = -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.11 to 0.01; P = 0.117). There was no important difference in intraoperative average mitoPO2 between patients assigned to personalized or to routine intraoperative arterial pressure management (P = 0.653). MitoPO2 under general anesthesia was about a quarter lower than preoperative awake mitoPO2, substantially fluctuated during major non-cardiac surgery, and transiently decreased below 20 mmHg in about two-thirds of the patients. Personalized - compared to routine - intraoperative arterial pressure management did not increase intraoperative mitoPO2. Whether intraoperative decreases in mitoPO2 are clinically meaningful warrants further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.