Stereo-electroencephalography pattern and long-term seizure outcome in hypothalamic hamartoma treated by radiofrequency thermocoagulation.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chang Liu, Xiu Wang, Zhong Zheng, Wenhan Hu, Xiaoli Yang, Xiaoqiu Shao, Kai Zhang, Shuli Liang
{"title":"Stereo-electroencephalography pattern and long-term seizure outcome in hypothalamic hamartoma treated by radiofrequency thermocoagulation.","authors":"Chang Liu, Xiu Wang, Zhong Zheng, Wenhan Hu, Xiaoli Yang, Xiaoqiu Shao, Kai Zhang, Shuli Liang","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for seizure freedom in patients with hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) undergoing radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) guided by stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors enrolled 30 patients with HH-related epilepsy who underwent SEEG-guided RFTC and were followed up for at least 3 years. Seizure outcomes were assessed using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification, with classes 1 and 2 defined as seizure freedom. Considering the observed time to relapse, the authors defined postoperative follow-up within 1 year as short-term follow-up. They analyzed lesion features, epileptic characteristics, and SEEG patterns for their relationship with short-term and long-term seizure freedom separately. Long-term complications were also reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 69.2 months (range 36-107 months) since the first RFTC. At the last follow-up, 20 patients (66.7%) achieved seizure freedom (ILAE classes 1 and 2). Regarding different seizure types, freedom was achieved in 81.8% of patients (18/22, after 2 cases relapsed) with gelastic seizures (GS) and in 52.9% patients (9/17, after 4 cases relapsed) with other types of seizures (i.e., nongelastic seizures [NGS]). Seizures characterized by focal low-voltage fast activity recorded by SEEG were more likely to achieve freedom both in the short term (p = 0.021) and the long term (p = 0.022). A history of HH resection might negatively impact a patient's outcome at long-term follow-up, whereas lesion location, volume, seizure types, or the seizure duration showed no significant influence on both short-term and long-term outcomes. Weight gain was the most common long-term complication (26.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEEG signal can guide HH ablation and serve as an important predictor for favorable seizure outcomes in both the short term and long term, a capability not exhibited by other factors thus far. Patients with a history of HH resection but who still experience NGSs should be considered carefully, as there may be a speculated mechanism of an NGS network re-forming, which can partly explain the outcome difference between patients with GSs and those with NGSs, as well as the progression of secondary epileptogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for seizure freedom in patients with hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) undergoing radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) guided by stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG).

Methods: The authors enrolled 30 patients with HH-related epilepsy who underwent SEEG-guided RFTC and were followed up for at least 3 years. Seizure outcomes were assessed using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification, with classes 1 and 2 defined as seizure freedom. Considering the observed time to relapse, the authors defined postoperative follow-up within 1 year as short-term follow-up. They analyzed lesion features, epileptic characteristics, and SEEG patterns for their relationship with short-term and long-term seizure freedom separately. Long-term complications were also reported.

Results: The mean follow-up was 69.2 months (range 36-107 months) since the first RFTC. At the last follow-up, 20 patients (66.7%) achieved seizure freedom (ILAE classes 1 and 2). Regarding different seizure types, freedom was achieved in 81.8% of patients (18/22, after 2 cases relapsed) with gelastic seizures (GS) and in 52.9% patients (9/17, after 4 cases relapsed) with other types of seizures (i.e., nongelastic seizures [NGS]). Seizures characterized by focal low-voltage fast activity recorded by SEEG were more likely to achieve freedom both in the short term (p = 0.021) and the long term (p = 0.022). A history of HH resection might negatively impact a patient's outcome at long-term follow-up, whereas lesion location, volume, seizure types, or the seizure duration showed no significant influence on both short-term and long-term outcomes. Weight gain was the most common long-term complication (26.7%).

Conclusions: The SEEG signal can guide HH ablation and serve as an important predictor for favorable seizure outcomes in both the short term and long term, a capability not exhibited by other factors thus far. Patients with a history of HH resection but who still experience NGSs should be considered carefully, as there may be a speculated mechanism of an NGS network re-forming, which can partly explain the outcome difference between patients with GSs and those with NGSs, as well as the progression of secondary epileptogenesis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信