Evaluation and prediction of relapse risk in stable systemic lupus erythematosus patients after glucocorticoid withdrawal (PRESS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled study in China.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1136/ard-2024-225826
Yunyun Fei, Lidan Zhao, Lijun Wu, Xiaoxia Zuo, Rongli Li, Jiaomei Cheng, Hui Luo, Xue Wu, Li Sun, Jingjing Xu, Yingxuan Zhu, Yang Wang, Zhu Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiaofei Wang, Xuan Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation and prediction of relapse risk in stable systemic lupus erythematosus patients after glucocorticoid withdrawal (PRESS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled study in China.","authors":"Yunyun Fei, Lidan Zhao, Lijun Wu, Xiaoxia Zuo, Rongli Li, Jiaomei Cheng, Hui Luo, Xue Wu, Li Sun, Jingjing Xu, Yingxuan Zhu, Yang Wang, Zhu Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiaofei Wang, Xuan Zhang","doi":"10.1136/ard-2024-225826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the relapse rate after glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal with or without hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) maintenance in sustained clinically inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRESS trial is a multicentre, 33-week, open-label, three-arm, non-inferiority designed, randomised controlled trial. SLE patients with sustained clinically inactive disease who maintained on low-dose GC plus HCQ therapy were screened and qualified patients were randomly assigned to three groups: drug-free group (both GC and HCQ withdrew); HCQ group (discontinued GC but maintained HCQ); dual maintenance group (both GC and HCQ continued). The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing a relapse as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index flare index by 33 weeks. Two parallel non-inferiority analyses were performed (drug-free group vs dual maintenance group and HCQ group vs dual maintenance group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3 November 2016 to 13 August 2021, 333 participants complied with the protocol after randomisation were analysed. The relapse rates in the three groups were 26.1%, 11.2% and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with dual maintenance group, drug-free group failed to achieve non-inferiority significance (relapse rate difference 21.4%; 95% CI 12.3% to 30.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.238), whereas HCQ group achieved non-inferiority (relapse rate difference 6.5%; 95% CI -0.5% to 13.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.034). HCQ group also exhibited fewer relapses than drug-free group (p=0.006). Adverse events were similar among all three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GC withdrawal may be feasible in sustained clinically inactive SLE patients. HCQ maintenance can exert a protective role in preventing disease relapse after GC withdrawal. Trial registration number NCT02842814.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"84 2","pages":"274-283"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-225826","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the relapse rate after glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal with or without hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) maintenance in sustained clinically inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: The PRESS trial is a multicentre, 33-week, open-label, three-arm, non-inferiority designed, randomised controlled trial. SLE patients with sustained clinically inactive disease who maintained on low-dose GC plus HCQ therapy were screened and qualified patients were randomly assigned to three groups: drug-free group (both GC and HCQ withdrew); HCQ group (discontinued GC but maintained HCQ); dual maintenance group (both GC and HCQ continued). The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing a relapse as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index flare index by 33 weeks. Two parallel non-inferiority analyses were performed (drug-free group vs dual maintenance group and HCQ group vs dual maintenance group).

Results: From 3 November 2016 to 13 August 2021, 333 participants complied with the protocol after randomisation were analysed. The relapse rates in the three groups were 26.1%, 11.2% and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with dual maintenance group, drug-free group failed to achieve non-inferiority significance (relapse rate difference 21.4%; 95% CI 12.3% to 30.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.238), whereas HCQ group achieved non-inferiority (relapse rate difference 6.5%; 95% CI -0.5% to 13.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.034). HCQ group also exhibited fewer relapses than drug-free group (p=0.006). Adverse events were similar among all three groups.

Conclusions: GC withdrawal may be feasible in sustained clinically inactive SLE patients. HCQ maintenance can exert a protective role in preventing disease relapse after GC withdrawal. Trial registration number NCT02842814.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信