Randomized Trial of Fixed-Dose Capecitabine Compared With Standard-Dose Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer: X-7/7 Trial.

JCO oncology advances Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1200/OA-24-00068
Qamar J Khan, Colleen Bohnenkamp, Taylor E Monson, Milind A Phadnis, Lauren Clark, Holly E Smith, Vinay Raja, Manana Elia, Anne O'Dea, Mark R Fesen, Gregory J Crane, Lauren E Nye, Joaquina C Baranda, Robert E Pluenneke, Marc Hoffmann, Raed Moh'd Taiseer Al-Rajabi, Anup Kasi, Richard J McKittrick, Laura Mitchell, Stephanie LaFaver, Priyanka Sharma
{"title":"Randomized Trial of Fixed-Dose Capecitabine Compared With Standard-Dose Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer: X-7/7 Trial.","authors":"Qamar J Khan, Colleen Bohnenkamp, Taylor E Monson, Milind A Phadnis, Lauren Clark, Holly E Smith, Vinay Raja, Manana Elia, Anne O'Dea, Mark R Fesen, Gregory J Crane, Lauren E Nye, Joaquina C Baranda, Robert E Pluenneke, Marc Hoffmann, Raed Moh'd Taiseer Al-Rajabi, Anup Kasi, Richard J McKittrick, Laura Mitchell, Stephanie LaFaver, Priyanka Sharma","doi":"10.1200/OA-24-00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), oral capecitabine prescribed at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dose of 1,250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily, 14 days on, 7 days off, is associated with poor tolerance. Mathematical models suggest that a fixed-dose (FD), dose-dense schedule may optimize efficacy. We conducted a randomized, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of FD capecitabine, 1,500 mg twice daily, 7 days on, 7 days off (FD-7/7), with the FDA-approved dose and schedule (standard-dose [SD]-14/7).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females with MBC and any previous lines of therapy were included. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either FD-7/7 or SD-14/7. The primary end point was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS). Capecitabine-related toxicities were graded at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2015 and April 2021, 153 patients were enrolled (n = 80 FD-7/7, n = 73 SD-14/7). The 3-month PFS was 63.1% (95% CI, 52.0 to 74.2) in the FD-7/7 arm and 67.2% (95% CI, 54.5 to 79.9) in the SD-14/7 arm. Restricted mean survival time was used to report estimates of effect. The PFS (restricted mean) at 33 months was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 12.6) in the FD-7/7 arm compared with 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 11.7) in the SD-14/7 arm. The overall survival (restricted mean) at 80 months was 30.6 months (95% CI, 23.6 to 37.6) in the FD-7/7 arm versus 24.5 months (95% CI, 18 to 31.1) in the SD-14/7 arm. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation occurred in 24 patients (32.9%) in the SD-14/7 arm compared with seven patients (8.8%) in the FD-7/7 arm (<i>P</i> = .0002). Grade 2 to 4 toxicities occurred in 79.5% in the SD-14/7 arm compared with 37.5% in the FD-7/7 arm (<i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In MBC, FD capecitabine 1,500 mg twice daily on a 7/7 schedule has less toxicity and similar efficacy when compared with body surface area-based dosing on a 14/7 schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":520350,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology advances","volume":"2 1","pages":"e2400068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OA-24-00068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), oral capecitabine prescribed at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dose of 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily, 14 days on, 7 days off, is associated with poor tolerance. Mathematical models suggest that a fixed-dose (FD), dose-dense schedule may optimize efficacy. We conducted a randomized, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of FD capecitabine, 1,500 mg twice daily, 7 days on, 7 days off (FD-7/7), with the FDA-approved dose and schedule (standard-dose [SD]-14/7).

Methods: Females with MBC and any previous lines of therapy were included. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either FD-7/7 or SD-14/7. The primary end point was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS). Capecitabine-related toxicities were graded at each visit.

Results: Between October 2015 and April 2021, 153 patients were enrolled (n = 80 FD-7/7, n = 73 SD-14/7). The 3-month PFS was 63.1% (95% CI, 52.0 to 74.2) in the FD-7/7 arm and 67.2% (95% CI, 54.5 to 79.9) in the SD-14/7 arm. Restricted mean survival time was used to report estimates of effect. The PFS (restricted mean) at 33 months was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 12.6) in the FD-7/7 arm compared with 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 11.7) in the SD-14/7 arm. The overall survival (restricted mean) at 80 months was 30.6 months (95% CI, 23.6 to 37.6) in the FD-7/7 arm versus 24.5 months (95% CI, 18 to 31.1) in the SD-14/7 arm. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation occurred in 24 patients (32.9%) in the SD-14/7 arm compared with seven patients (8.8%) in the FD-7/7 arm (P = .0002). Grade 2 to 4 toxicities occurred in 79.5% in the SD-14/7 arm compared with 37.5% in the FD-7/7 arm (P < .0001).

Conclusion: In MBC, FD capecitabine 1,500 mg twice daily on a 7/7 schedule has less toxicity and similar efficacy when compared with body surface area-based dosing on a 14/7 schedule.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信