Gemcitabine-induced digital necrosis in a patient with cervical squamous cell carcinoma: case report and literature review

Syndy Guarín-Rivera, Harold Pineda-Arango, César Balaguera-Becerra, Marisol Carreño-Jaimes, Jesús Utria-Munive
{"title":"Gemcitabine-induced digital necrosis in a patient with cervical squamous cell carcinoma: case report and literature review","authors":"Syndy Guarín-Rivera, Harold Pineda-Arango, César Balaguera-Becerra, Marisol Carreño-Jaimes, Jesús Utria-Munive","doi":"10.18597/rcog.4248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To present the case of a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix who developed distal necrosis following treatment with gemcitabine, and to perform a literature review to assess the association between the cumulative dose of gemcitabine, diagnosis, and management of this complication.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A 61 year old patient was treated with gemcitabine (total accumulated dose of 11,744 mg/m²) for metastatic disease at a private, nononcological, fourth level general hospital, where she was receiving outpatient management. She developed distal necrosis of the second finger on her right hand, leading to the discontinuation of gemcitabine and necessitating amputation of the affected finger. A search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and Lilacs for case reports and case series on gemcitabine induced distal necrosis. Data on dosage, diagnosis, and treatment were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen case reports including 19 cases of distal necrosis were identified. The cumulative doses of gemcitabine ranged from 1,700 to 28,700 mg/m². Diagnosis was primarily clinical, supplemented by angiography and Doppler ultrasound; treatment included discontinuation of gemcitabine, initiation of vasodilators, anticoagulants, and symptomatic management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is essential to recognize vascular toxicity as a potential adverse effect of gemcitabine and to conduct appropriate risk stratification in patients with advanced cancer and multiple prior treatment lines. Increased monitoring for this adverse effect is warranted with the use of this medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":101422,"journal":{"name":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To present the case of a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix who developed distal necrosis following treatment with gemcitabine, and to perform a literature review to assess the association between the cumulative dose of gemcitabine, diagnosis, and management of this complication.

Material and methods: A 61 year old patient was treated with gemcitabine (total accumulated dose of 11,744 mg/m²) for metastatic disease at a private, nononcological, fourth level general hospital, where she was receiving outpatient management. She developed distal necrosis of the second finger on her right hand, leading to the discontinuation of gemcitabine and necessitating amputation of the affected finger. A search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and Lilacs for case reports and case series on gemcitabine induced distal necrosis. Data on dosage, diagnosis, and treatment were extracted.

Results: Fifteen case reports including 19 cases of distal necrosis were identified. The cumulative doses of gemcitabine ranged from 1,700 to 28,700 mg/m². Diagnosis was primarily clinical, supplemented by angiography and Doppler ultrasound; treatment included discontinuation of gemcitabine, initiation of vasodilators, anticoagulants, and symptomatic management.

Conclusions: It is essential to recognize vascular toxicity as a potential adverse effect of gemcitabine and to conduct appropriate risk stratification in patients with advanced cancer and multiple prior treatment lines. Increased monitoring for this adverse effect is warranted with the use of this medication.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信