Quantitative susceptibility mapping is more sensitive and specific than phase imaging in detecting chronic active multiple sclerosis lesion rims: pathological validation.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf011
Kelly M Gillen, Thanh D Nguyen, Alexey Dimov, Ilhami Kovanlikaya, Ha Manh Luu, Emily Demmon, Daniel M Markowitz, Francesca Bagnato, David Pitt, Susan A Gauthier, Yi Wang
{"title":"Quantitative susceptibility mapping is more sensitive and specific than phase imaging in detecting chronic active multiple sclerosis lesion rims: pathological validation.","authors":"Kelly M Gillen, Thanh D Nguyen, Alexey Dimov, Ilhami Kovanlikaya, Ha Manh Luu, Emily Demmon, Daniel M Markowitz, Francesca Bagnato, David Pitt, Susan A Gauthier, Yi Wang","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase imaging are used to identify multiple sclerosis lesions with paramagnetic rims that slowly expand over time and are associated with earlier progression to disability, decreased brain volume and increased frequency of clinical relapse. However, the presence of iron-laden microglia/macrophages at the lesion rim and demyelination within the lesion both contribute to phase and quantitative susceptibility mapping images. Therefore, simultaneous pathological validation is needed to assess accuracies in identifying iron-positive lesions. MRI was performed on 15 multiple sclerosis brain slabs; 32 lesions of interest were processed for myelin, iron and microglial markers. Three experienced readers classified lesions as rim positive or negative on quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase; these classifications were compared with Perls' stain as the gold standard. All 10 of the quantitative susceptibility mapping-positive lesions had iron-positive rims on histology. Of the 16 phase-positive lesions, only 10 had iron-positive rims on histology. Using Perls' stain as the ground truth, the positive predictive value was 100% for quantitative susceptibility mapping and 63% for phase; the negative predictive value was 95% for quantitative susceptibility mapping and 94% for phase. Post-mortem imaging results demonstrate that quantitative susceptibility mapping is a more reliable indicator of an iron-positive rim compared with phase imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcaf011"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase imaging are used to identify multiple sclerosis lesions with paramagnetic rims that slowly expand over time and are associated with earlier progression to disability, decreased brain volume and increased frequency of clinical relapse. However, the presence of iron-laden microglia/macrophages at the lesion rim and demyelination within the lesion both contribute to phase and quantitative susceptibility mapping images. Therefore, simultaneous pathological validation is needed to assess accuracies in identifying iron-positive lesions. MRI was performed on 15 multiple sclerosis brain slabs; 32 lesions of interest were processed for myelin, iron and microglial markers. Three experienced readers classified lesions as rim positive or negative on quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase; these classifications were compared with Perls' stain as the gold standard. All 10 of the quantitative susceptibility mapping-positive lesions had iron-positive rims on histology. Of the 16 phase-positive lesions, only 10 had iron-positive rims on histology. Using Perls' stain as the ground truth, the positive predictive value was 100% for quantitative susceptibility mapping and 63% for phase; the negative predictive value was 95% for quantitative susceptibility mapping and 94% for phase. Post-mortem imaging results demonstrate that quantitative susceptibility mapping is a more reliable indicator of an iron-positive rim compared with phase imaging.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信