Comparative investigations of progressive lenses.

H Diepes, A Tameling
{"title":"Comparative investigations of progressive lenses.","authors":"H Diepes,&nbsp;A Tameling","doi":"10.1097/00006324-198807000-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different types of progressive addition lenses were compared with each other. It was our aim to measure all parameters in such a way that they were consistent with the normal wearing situation. The distribution of the spherical power and astigmatism was measured with a special focimeter. The induced distortion, which is important for patient acceptance, was determined by a photographic method. There are significant differences between the various types of progressive addition lenses. However, objective information is not sufficient to resolve the subjective question of patient acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7700,"journal":{"name":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","volume":"65 7","pages":"571-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-198807000-00007","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198807000-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Different types of progressive addition lenses were compared with each other. It was our aim to measure all parameters in such a way that they were consistent with the normal wearing situation. The distribution of the spherical power and astigmatism was measured with a special focimeter. The induced distortion, which is important for patient acceptance, was determined by a photographic method. There are significant differences between the various types of progressive addition lenses. However, objective information is not sufficient to resolve the subjective question of patient acceptance.

渐进晶状体的比较研究。
对不同类型的渐进加法透镜进行了比较。我们的目标是以一种与正常佩戴情况一致的方式测量所有参数。用专用焦距计测量了球面功率和像散的分布。诱导畸变对病人的接受是很重要的,用照相法测定。不同类型的渐进加法透镜之间存在显著差异。然而,客观信息不足以解决患者接受的主观问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信