Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13797.1
Nuala Lucas, Alison Gooda, Ruth Tunn, Marian Knight
{"title":"Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study.","authors":"Nuala Lucas, Alison Gooda, Ruth Tunn, Marian Knight","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13797.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is the most frequent cause of death associated with complications of airway management during general anaesthesia. Pregnancy increases aspiration risk owing to factors including delayed gastric emptying and increased intragastric pressure. We describe the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcomes of maternal pulmonary aspiration in pregnancy in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based surveillance and case-control study. Between September 2013 and August 2016, all UK consultant-led obstetric units prospectively identified cases of pulmonary aspiration among parturient women using a pre-defined case definition, and reported them via the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Controls (n=1982) were obtained from four UKOSS studies conducted between 2005 and 2014. We calculated the incidence of pulmonary aspiration using 2013-2015 maternities as the denominator. We explored potential risk factors for aspiration using univariable logistic regression and described outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 cases of pulmonary aspiration, giving an incidence of 5.2 per 1,000,000 maternities (95% CI 2.69-9.09). Cases were significantly less likely than controls to be multiparous (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 0.255, 95% CI 0.069-0.946), and significantly more likely to undergo caesarean section (uOR 24.89, 95% CI 3.18-194.85) and to receive general anaesthetic for caesarean section (p<0.001). Gestation was significantly shorter in cases than controls (uOR 0.782, 95% CI 0.702-0.870). Women who aspirated were significantly more likely to be admitted to the intensive therapy unit than controls (p<0.001). Infants of women who aspirated had significantly lower Apgar scores and were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or to be stillborn compared with infants of women in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulmonary aspiration is rare in UK obstetric anaesthetic practice; however, it remains a risk of general anaesthesia. Despite a large study population, our analyses lacked power to evaluate many potential risk factors. Future research should focus on developing methods to accurately identify pregnant women at risk of aspiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13797.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is the most frequent cause of death associated with complications of airway management during general anaesthesia. Pregnancy increases aspiration risk owing to factors including delayed gastric emptying and increased intragastric pressure. We describe the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcomes of maternal pulmonary aspiration in pregnancy in the UK.

Methods: We conducted a population-based surveillance and case-control study. Between September 2013 and August 2016, all UK consultant-led obstetric units prospectively identified cases of pulmonary aspiration among parturient women using a pre-defined case definition, and reported them via the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Controls (n=1982) were obtained from four UKOSS studies conducted between 2005 and 2014. We calculated the incidence of pulmonary aspiration using 2013-2015 maternities as the denominator. We explored potential risk factors for aspiration using univariable logistic regression and described outcomes.

Results: We identified 12 cases of pulmonary aspiration, giving an incidence of 5.2 per 1,000,000 maternities (95% CI 2.69-9.09). Cases were significantly less likely than controls to be multiparous (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 0.255, 95% CI 0.069-0.946), and significantly more likely to undergo caesarean section (uOR 24.89, 95% CI 3.18-194.85) and to receive general anaesthetic for caesarean section (p<0.001). Gestation was significantly shorter in cases than controls (uOR 0.782, 95% CI 0.702-0.870). Women who aspirated were significantly more likely to be admitted to the intensive therapy unit than controls (p<0.001). Infants of women who aspirated had significantly lower Apgar scores and were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or to be stillborn compared with infants of women in the control group.

Conclusions: Pulmonary aspiration is rare in UK obstetric anaesthetic practice; however, it remains a risk of general anaesthesia. Despite a large study population, our analyses lacked power to evaluate many potential risk factors. Future research should focus on developing methods to accurately identify pregnant women at risk of aspiration.

在英国,怀孕期间或产后立即发生肺误吸:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
背景:胃内容物肺误吸是全身麻醉期间气道管理并发症最常见的死亡原因。由于胃排空延迟和胃内压增加等因素,妊娠增加误吸风险。我们描述的发生率,危险因素,管理,并在英国的孕妇肺误吸的结果。方法:我们进行了一项基于人群的监测和病例对照研究。在2013年9月至2016年8月期间,所有由英国顾问领导的产科单位使用预先定义的病例定义前瞻性地确定了孕妇中的肺误吸病例,并通过英国产科监测系统(UKOSS)报告。对照(n=1982)来自2005年至2014年间进行的四项UKOSS研究。我们以2013-2015年产妇为分母计算肺误吸发生率。我们使用单变量逻辑回归探讨了误吸的潜在危险因素并描述了结果。结果:我们确定了12例肺误吸,发生率为5.2 / 1,000,000 (95% CI 2.69-9.09)。与对照组相比,病例发生多胎的可能性显著降低(未调整优势比[uOR] 0.255, 95% CI 0.069-0.946),而剖宫产(uOR 24.89, 95% CI 3.18-194.85)和剖宫产全麻的可能性显著增加(结论:肺误吸在英国产科麻醉实践中很少见;然而,它仍然有全身麻醉的风险。尽管研究人群很大,但我们的分析缺乏评估许多潜在危险因素的能力。未来的研究应侧重于开发准确识别有误吸风险的孕妇的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信