Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w
Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho
{"title":"Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.","authors":"Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, \"What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, "What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?".

Methods: We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.

Results: We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.

Conclusion: These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信