Investigating the Classification of Living Kidney Donation Experiences on Reddit and Understanding the Sensitivity of ChatGPT to Prompt Engineering: Content Analysis.

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.2196/57319
Joshua Nielsen, Xiaoyu Chen, LaShara Davis, Amy Waterman, Monica Gentili
{"title":"Investigating the Classification of Living Kidney Donation Experiences on Reddit and Understanding the Sensitivity of ChatGPT to Prompt Engineering: Content Analysis.","authors":"Joshua Nielsen, Xiaoyu Chen, LaShara Davis, Amy Waterman, Monica Gentili","doi":"10.2196/57319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living kidney donation (LKD), where individuals donate one kidney while alive, plays a critical role in increasing the number of kidneys available for those experiencing kidney failure. Previous studies show that many generous people are interested in becoming living donors; however, a huge gap exists between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of living donors yearly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To bridge this gap, we aimed to investigate how to identify potential living donors from discussions on public social media forums so that educational interventions could later be directed to them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Reddit forums as an example, this study described the classification of Reddit content shared about LKD into three classes: (1) present (presently dealing with LKD personally), (2) past (dealt with LKD personally in the past), and (3) other (LKD general comments). An evaluation was conducted comparing a fine-tuned distilled version of the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model with inference using GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT). To systematically evaluate ChatGPT's sensitivity to distinguishing between the 3 prompt categories, we used a comprehensive prompt engineering strategy encompassing a full factorial analysis in 48 runs. A novel prompt engineering approach, dialogue until classification consensus, was introduced to simulate a deliberation between 2 domain experts until a consensus on classification was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BERT and GPT-3.5 exhibited classification accuracies of approximately 75% and 78%, respectively. Recognizing the inherent ambiguity between classes, a post hoc analysis of incorrect predictions revealed sensible reasoning and acceptable errors in the predictive models. Considering these acceptable mismatched predictions, the accuracy improved to 89.3% for BERT and 90.7% for GPT-3.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large language models, such as GPT-3.5, are highly capable of detecting and categorizing LKD-targeted content on social media forums. They are sensitive to instructions, and the introduced dialogue until classification consensus method exhibited superior performance over stand-alone reasoning, highlighting the merit in advancing prompt engineering methodologies. The models can produce appropriate contextual reasoning, even when final conclusions differ from their human counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"4 ","pages":"e57319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living kidney donation (LKD), where individuals donate one kidney while alive, plays a critical role in increasing the number of kidneys available for those experiencing kidney failure. Previous studies show that many generous people are interested in becoming living donors; however, a huge gap exists between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of living donors yearly.

Objective: To bridge this gap, we aimed to investigate how to identify potential living donors from discussions on public social media forums so that educational interventions could later be directed to them.

Methods: Using Reddit forums as an example, this study described the classification of Reddit content shared about LKD into three classes: (1) present (presently dealing with LKD personally), (2) past (dealt with LKD personally in the past), and (3) other (LKD general comments). An evaluation was conducted comparing a fine-tuned distilled version of the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model with inference using GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT). To systematically evaluate ChatGPT's sensitivity to distinguishing between the 3 prompt categories, we used a comprehensive prompt engineering strategy encompassing a full factorial analysis in 48 runs. A novel prompt engineering approach, dialogue until classification consensus, was introduced to simulate a deliberation between 2 domain experts until a consensus on classification was achieved.

Results: BERT and GPT-3.5 exhibited classification accuracies of approximately 75% and 78%, respectively. Recognizing the inherent ambiguity between classes, a post hoc analysis of incorrect predictions revealed sensible reasoning and acceptable errors in the predictive models. Considering these acceptable mismatched predictions, the accuracy improved to 89.3% for BERT and 90.7% for GPT-3.5.

Conclusions: Large language models, such as GPT-3.5, are highly capable of detecting and categorizing LKD-targeted content on social media forums. They are sensitive to instructions, and the introduced dialogue until classification consensus method exhibited superior performance over stand-alone reasoning, highlighting the merit in advancing prompt engineering methodologies. The models can produce appropriate contextual reasoning, even when final conclusions differ from their human counterparts.

调查Reddit上活体肾脏捐赠经验的分类,了解ChatGPT对提示工程的敏感性:内容分析。
背景:活体肾脏捐赠(LKD),即个人在活着的时候捐出一个肾脏,在增加肾功能衰竭患者可获得的肾脏数量方面起着关键作用。先前的研究表明,许多慷慨的人有兴趣成为活体捐赠者;然而,每年等待名单上的患者数量与活体捐赠者数量之间存在巨大差距。目的:为了弥补这一差距,我们旨在研究如何从公共社交媒体论坛的讨论中识别潜在的活体捐赠者,以便随后针对他们进行教育干预。方法:本研究以Reddit论坛为例,将Reddit上分享的关于LKD的内容分为三类:(1)现在(目前与LKD个人打交道),(2)过去(过去与LKD个人打交道),(3)其他(LKD一般评论)。进行了一项评估,比较了经过微调的蒸馏版本的双向编码器表示从变压器(BERT)模型与使用GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT)的推理。为了系统地评估ChatGPT区分3种提示类别的敏感性,我们使用了一种综合提示工程策略,包括48次运行的全因子分析。引入了一种新的快速工程方法,对话直到分类共识,以模拟两个领域专家之间的审议,直到对分类达成共识。结果:BERT和GPT-3.5的分类准确率分别约为75%和78%。认识到类之间固有的模糊性,对错误预测的事后分析揭示了预测模型中的合理推理和可接受的错误。考虑到这些可接受的不匹配预测,BERT的准确率提高到89.3%,GPT-3.5的准确率提高到90.7%。结论:GPT-3.5等大型语言模型对社交媒体论坛上针对lkd的内容进行检测和分类的能力很强。它们对指令很敏感,并且引入的对话直到分类共识方法表现出优于独立推理的性能,突出了推进快速工程方法的优点。即使最终的结论与人类的结论不同,这些模型也能产生适当的上下文推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信