Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Maximum Thickness of Medial Meniscus Exceeding 10 mm Are Strongly Associated With Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Makoto Suruga, Takanori Iriuchishima, Takashi Kozu, Yoshiyuki Yahagi, Hyunho Lee, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Maximum Thickness of Medial Meniscus Exceeding 10 mm Are Strongly Associated With Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear.","authors":"Makoto Suruga, Takanori Iriuchishima, Takashi Kozu, Yoshiyuki Yahagi, Hyunho Lee, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic utility of measuring the maximum thickness of the medial meniscus (MTMM) for detecting medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated patients with medial meniscus (MM) injuries who underwent arthroscopic procedures between January 2018 and February 2024. Patients with concomitant lateral meniscal injuries, ligament injuries, or a history of knee trauma were excluded. MTMM was measured as the maximum vertical length in the coronal plane, identified by systematically measuring all slices using digital calipers on proton density-weighted fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequences. A reference group consisted of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients with no meniscal injuries confirmed during arthroscopy. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the relationships between MTMM and meniscal injury patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 35 MMPRT patients (mean age, 56.9 years), 138 other MM injuries (51.8 years), and 60 reference patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (28.4 years). MTMM was significantly greater in the MMPRT group compared to other MM injuries (10.7 ± 1.5 mm vs 8.1 ± 1.4 mm, P < .05) and intact medial meniscus (7.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff value of 10.05 mm (sensitivity, 77.1%; specificity, 92.8%; area under the curve, 0.906). Based on this analysis, MTMM >10 mm was designated as the \"thickened meniscus sign.\" Twenty-seven of 35 MMPRT cases showed a positive thickened meniscus sign, while no cases in the reference group exceeded this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTMM was significantly greater in MMPRT cases compared to other MM injuries. The thickened meniscus sign (MTMM >10 mm) had high diagnostic performance with 92.8% specificity, providing a simple and reliable screening tool for MMPRT detection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅲ, retrospective diagnostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of measuring the maximum thickness of the medial meniscus (MTMM) for detecting medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients with medial meniscus (MM) injuries who underwent arthroscopic procedures between January 2018 and February 2024. Patients with concomitant lateral meniscal injuries, ligament injuries, or a history of knee trauma were excluded. MTMM was measured as the maximum vertical length in the coronal plane, identified by systematically measuring all slices using digital calipers on proton density-weighted fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequences. A reference group consisted of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients with no meniscal injuries confirmed during arthroscopy. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the relationships between MTMM and meniscal injury patterns.

Results: The study included 35 MMPRT patients (mean age, 56.9 years), 138 other MM injuries (51.8 years), and 60 reference patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (28.4 years). MTMM was significantly greater in the MMPRT group compared to other MM injuries (10.7 ± 1.5 mm vs 8.1 ± 1.4 mm, P < .05) and intact medial meniscus (7.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff value of 10.05 mm (sensitivity, 77.1%; specificity, 92.8%; area under the curve, 0.906). Based on this analysis, MTMM >10 mm was designated as the "thickened meniscus sign." Twenty-seven of 35 MMPRT cases showed a positive thickened meniscus sign, while no cases in the reference group exceeded this threshold.

Conclusions: MTMM was significantly greater in MMPRT cases compared to other MM injuries. The thickened meniscus sign (MTMM >10 mm) had high diagnostic performance with 92.8% specificity, providing a simple and reliable screening tool for MMPRT detection.

Level of evidence: Level Ⅲ, retrospective diagnostic study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信