Pilot Testing a Peer-Led Self-Management Program for Women After Breast Cancer.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Karin Ribi, Franziska Schmidt, Jörg Haslbeck, Corinne Urech, Karin Holm, Manuela Eicher
{"title":"Pilot Testing a Peer-Led Self-Management Program for Women After Breast Cancer.","authors":"Karin Ribi, Franziska Schmidt, Jörg Haslbeck, Corinne Urech, Karin Holm, Manuela Eicher","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different approaches exist to support self-management in breast cancer (BC) survivors. The aim of this project was to cocreate a new version of an existing peer-led program to meet the needs of BC survivors in Switzerland. In a pilot study, the preliminary efficacy in terms of self-management skills and symptom burden and the feasibility of implementing it in two Swiss university hospitals was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design with two consecutive cohorts of women with early-stage BC who had completed primary treatment was applied. BC survivors (peers) led the 7-week course of weekly small-group sessions of 2.5 to 3 hours. The primary outcome was change in self-management skills; secondary outcomes included change in self-efficacy, symptom burden, and health literacy. Between-group changes were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U or X² test, individual changes using the Reliable Change Index. Feasibility was assessed using qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 95 BC survivors screened for inclusion criteria, 68 were eligible, 18 agreed to participate in the control group and 20 in the intervention group. No significant differences were found between the groups for any of the outcomes. Individual changes in self-management skills were noted in both groups. Several issues related to course delivery and feasibility were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current form of the program did not fully meet the needs of BC survivors, and implementation into the clinical care pathway appeared to be challenging. The program may benefit from providing the possibility of spontaneous interaction and discussion and considering elements of e-health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"151814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different approaches exist to support self-management in breast cancer (BC) survivors. The aim of this project was to cocreate a new version of an existing peer-led program to meet the needs of BC survivors in Switzerland. In a pilot study, the preliminary efficacy in terms of self-management skills and symptom burden and the feasibility of implementing it in two Swiss university hospitals was assessed.

Methods: A prospective nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design with two consecutive cohorts of women with early-stage BC who had completed primary treatment was applied. BC survivors (peers) led the 7-week course of weekly small-group sessions of 2.5 to 3 hours. The primary outcome was change in self-management skills; secondary outcomes included change in self-efficacy, symptom burden, and health literacy. Between-group changes were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U or X² test, individual changes using the Reliable Change Index. Feasibility was assessed using qualitative methods.

Results: Of the 95 BC survivors screened for inclusion criteria, 68 were eligible, 18 agreed to participate in the control group and 20 in the intervention group. No significant differences were found between the groups for any of the outcomes. Individual changes in self-management skills were noted in both groups. Several issues related to course delivery and feasibility were identified.

Conclusions: The current form of the program did not fully meet the needs of BC survivors, and implementation into the clinical care pathway appeared to be challenging. The program may benefit from providing the possibility of spontaneous interaction and discussion and considering elements of e-health interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信