Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
James Soresi, Christina Bertilone, Eileen Banks, Theresa Marshall, Kevin Murray, David B Preen
{"title":"Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review.","authors":"James Soresi, Christina Bertilone, Eileen Banks, Theresa Marshall, Kevin Murray, David B Preen","doi":"10.1177/14604582251315414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Increasing digitisation in healthcare is flowing through to quality improvement strategies, like audit and feedback. <b>Objectives:</b> To systematically review electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) interventions in hospital settings, examining contemporary practices and quantitatively assessing the relationship between features and effectiveness. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review using a structured search strategy from 2011 to July 2022. Searches yielded a total of 5095 unique publications, with 152 included in a descriptive synthesis, reporting publication characteristics and practices, and 63 in the quantitative synthesis, to evaluate the effect size of intervention features. <b>Results:</b> The search returned publications across characteristics, including countries of origin, feedback topics, target health professionals, and study design types. We also identified an association with effectiveness for all but one of the features examined, with a Cohen's <i>d</i> ranging from above +0.8 (a large positive effect), to -0.67 (a medium negative effect). Socio-technical features related to supportive organisations and the involvement of engaged health professionals were most associated with effective interventions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Key findings have confirmed that a common set of features of e-A&F systems can influence effectiveness. Results provide practitioners with insight into where resources should be focused during the implementation of e-A&F.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"14604582251315414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251315414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing digitisation in healthcare is flowing through to quality improvement strategies, like audit and feedback. Objectives: To systematically review electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) interventions in hospital settings, examining contemporary practices and quantitatively assessing the relationship between features and effectiveness. Methods: We performed a systematic review using a structured search strategy from 2011 to July 2022. Searches yielded a total of 5095 unique publications, with 152 included in a descriptive synthesis, reporting publication characteristics and practices, and 63 in the quantitative synthesis, to evaluate the effect size of intervention features. Results: The search returned publications across characteristics, including countries of origin, feedback topics, target health professionals, and study design types. We also identified an association with effectiveness for all but one of the features examined, with a Cohen's d ranging from above +0.8 (a large positive effect), to -0.67 (a medium negative effect). Socio-technical features related to supportive organisations and the involvement of engaged health professionals were most associated with effective interventions. Conclusion: Key findings have confirmed that a common set of features of e-A&F systems can influence effectiveness. Results provide practitioners with insight into where resources should be focused during the implementation of e-A&F.

电子审计和反馈对医院患者安全和护理质量的特点和有效性:系统回顾。
背景:越来越多的医疗保健数字化正在流向质量改进策略,如审计和反馈。目的:系统地回顾医院设置中的电子审计和反馈(e-A&F)干预措施,检查当代实践并定量评估特征与有效性之间的关系。方法:从2011年到2022年7月,我们使用结构化搜索策略进行了系统回顾。检索共产生5095个独特的出版物,其中152个纳入描述性综合,报告出版物特征和实践,63个纳入定量综合,以评估干预特征的效应大小。结果:检索返回的出版物具有不同的特征,包括原产国、反馈主题、目标卫生专业人员和研究设计类型。我们还发现,除了一个特征外,所有特征的有效性都与Cohen’s d相关,其范围从+0.8以上(大的积极影响)到-0.67(中等的消极影响)。与支持性组织有关的社会技术特征和从事保健工作的专业人员的参与与有效的干预措施最相关。结论:主要研究结果证实了e-A&F系统的一组共同特征会影响其有效性。结果为从业者提供了在实施e-A&F期间资源应该集中在哪里的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信