Assessing Racial Heterogeneity in "Housing First" Supports' Effectiveness Among Older Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Evidence From Los Angeles County.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Jared N Schachner, Steven Schmidt, Gary D Painter
{"title":"Assessing Racial Heterogeneity in \"Housing First\" Supports' Effectiveness Among Older Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Evidence From Los Angeles County.","authors":"Jared N Schachner, Steven Schmidt, Gary D Painter","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Just as the U.S. population is aging and racially diversifying, housing prices are spiking. These conditions could spur a homelessness crisis among older adults of color. Although researchers have examined racial stratification and age-based differences in homelessness risk, separately, few studies probe whether age and race interact to render older adults of color more vulnerable to repeated episodes of homelessness than younger adults and older White adults. Fewer still have considered whether and why \"Housing First\" interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing [RRH], permanent supportive housing [PSH]) are disproportionately effective-or ineffective-in reducing this risk for older adults of color.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using individual-level data from Los Angeles County's Homelessness Management Information System, tracking Continuum of Care (CoC) services received between 2013 and 2019, we show how race and age jointly shape the risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial CoC service. Linear probability models reveal whether PSH and RRH disproportionately reduce this risk for Black versus White older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses indicate an age-race interaction, whereby Black adults aged 55-64 exhibit a particularly high risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial service. PSH disproportionately reduces this risk for Black older adults.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>We conclude that \"Housing First\" interventions may hold particular promise for older adults of color, perhaps because these groups sort into more effective programs, on average. Future research on aging and housing should highlight heterogeneity and consider program sorting processes as a potential explanation for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Just as the U.S. population is aging and racially diversifying, housing prices are spiking. These conditions could spur a homelessness crisis among older adults of color. Although researchers have examined racial stratification and age-based differences in homelessness risk, separately, few studies probe whether age and race interact to render older adults of color more vulnerable to repeated episodes of homelessness than younger adults and older White adults. Fewer still have considered whether and why "Housing First" interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing [RRH], permanent supportive housing [PSH]) are disproportionately effective-or ineffective-in reducing this risk for older adults of color.

Research design and methods: Using individual-level data from Los Angeles County's Homelessness Management Information System, tracking Continuum of Care (CoC) services received between 2013 and 2019, we show how race and age jointly shape the risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial CoC service. Linear probability models reveal whether PSH and RRH disproportionately reduce this risk for Black versus White older adults.

Results: Our analyses indicate an age-race interaction, whereby Black adults aged 55-64 exhibit a particularly high risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial service. PSH disproportionately reduces this risk for Black older adults.

Discussion and implications: We conclude that "Housing First" interventions may hold particular promise for older adults of color, perhaps because these groups sort into more effective programs, on average. Future research on aging and housing should highlight heterogeneity and consider program sorting processes as a potential explanation for it.

Abstract Image

在经历无家可归的老年人中评估“住房优先”支持有效性的种族异质性:来自洛杉矶县的证据。
背景和目标:随着美国人口老龄化和种族多样化,房价也在飙升。这些情况可能会引发有色人种老年人的无家可归危机。尽管研究人员已经分别研究了种族分层和基于年龄的无家可归风险差异,但很少有研究探讨年龄和种族是否相互作用,使有色人种的老年人比年轻人和老年白人更容易反复出现无家可归的情况。更少人考虑“住房优先”干预措施(例如,快速安置/RRH,永久性支持性住房/PSH)是否以及为什么在降低有色人种老年人的这种风险方面不成比例地有效或无效。研究设计和方法:利用洛杉矶县无家可归者管理信息系统的个人层面数据,跟踪2013年至2019年期间接受的连续护理(CoC)服务,我们展示了种族和年龄如何共同影响在初始CoC服务后接受额外CoC无家可归者服务的风险。线性概率模型揭示了PSH和RRH是否不成比例地降低了黑人老年人与白人老年人的这种风险。结果:我们的分析表明了年龄-种族的相互作用,即55-64岁的黑人成年人在初始服务后接受额外CoC无家可归服务的风险最高。PSH不成比例地降低了黑人老年人的这种风险。讨论和启示:我们的结论是,“住房优先”的干预措施可能对有色人种的老年人有特别的希望,也许是因为这些群体平均来说更有效的项目。未来对老龄化和住房的研究应强调异质性,并考虑项目分类过程作为其潜在的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信