Assessing Racial Heterogeneity in "Housing First" Supports' Effectiveness among Older Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Evidence from Los Angeles County.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Jared N Schachner, Steven Schmidt, Gary D Painter
{"title":"Assessing Racial Heterogeneity in \"Housing First\" Supports' Effectiveness among Older Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Evidence from Los Angeles County.","authors":"Jared N Schachner, Steven Schmidt, Gary D Painter","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Just as the U.S. population is aging and racially diversifying, housing prices are spiking. These conditions could spur a homelessness crisis among older adults of color. Although researchers have examined racial stratification and age-based differences in homelessness risk, separately, few studies probe whether age and race interact to render older adults of color more vulnerable to repeated episodes of homelessness than younger adults and older White adults. Fewer still have considered whether and why \"Housing First\" interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing/RRH, permanent supportive housing/PSH) are disproportionately effective- or ineffective- in reducing this risk for older adults of color.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using individual-level data from Los Angeles County's Homelessness Management Information System, tracking Continuum of Care (CoC) services received between 2013 and 2019, we show how race and age jointly shape the risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial CoC service. Linear probability models reveal whether PSH and RRH disproportionately reduce this risk for Black versus White older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses indicate an age-race interaction, whereby Black adults aged 55-64 exhibit the highest risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial service. PSH disproportionately reduces this risk for Black older adults.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>We conclude that \"Housing First\" interventions may hold particular promise for older adults of color, perhaps because these groups sort into more effective programs, on average. Future research on aging and housing should highlight heterogeneity and consider program sorting processes as a potential explanation for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Just as the U.S. population is aging and racially diversifying, housing prices are spiking. These conditions could spur a homelessness crisis among older adults of color. Although researchers have examined racial stratification and age-based differences in homelessness risk, separately, few studies probe whether age and race interact to render older adults of color more vulnerable to repeated episodes of homelessness than younger adults and older White adults. Fewer still have considered whether and why "Housing First" interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing/RRH, permanent supportive housing/PSH) are disproportionately effective- or ineffective- in reducing this risk for older adults of color.

Research design and methods: Using individual-level data from Los Angeles County's Homelessness Management Information System, tracking Continuum of Care (CoC) services received between 2013 and 2019, we show how race and age jointly shape the risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial CoC service. Linear probability models reveal whether PSH and RRH disproportionately reduce this risk for Black versus White older adults.

Results: Our analyses indicate an age-race interaction, whereby Black adults aged 55-64 exhibit the highest risk of receiving additional CoC homelessness services after an initial service. PSH disproportionately reduces this risk for Black older adults.

Discussion and implications: We conclude that "Housing First" interventions may hold particular promise for older adults of color, perhaps because these groups sort into more effective programs, on average. Future research on aging and housing should highlight heterogeneity and consider program sorting processes as a potential explanation for it.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信