Evaluating the association between cannabis decriminalization and legalization and cannabis arrests and related disparities: A Systematic review

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Stephen D.S. McCarthy , Adrienne Gaudreault , Jennifer Xiao , Benedikt Fischer , Wayne Hall , Kathryn Lee , Rachel Kang , Garry Aslanyan , Manish M. Sood , Daniel T. Myran
{"title":"Evaluating the association between cannabis decriminalization and legalization and cannabis arrests and related disparities: A Systematic review","authors":"Stephen D.S. McCarthy ,&nbsp;Adrienne Gaudreault ,&nbsp;Jennifer Xiao ,&nbsp;Benedikt Fischer ,&nbsp;Wayne Hall ,&nbsp;Kathryn Lee ,&nbsp;Rachel Kang ,&nbsp;Garry Aslanyan ,&nbsp;Manish M. Sood ,&nbsp;Daniel T. Myran","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While a key goal of liberalizing cannabis policy is to reduce harms related to criminal justice involvement, the degree to which this occurs and how it varies by policy format is uncertain. We completed a systematic review of changes in cannabis offences overall and across subgroups after cannabis policy liberalization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search of 7 databases was conducted for studies examining changes in cannabis offences, including arrests, charges, convictions, and referrals, before and after cannabis policy changes. Four types of cannabis policy change were considered: medical legalization, non-medical decriminalization, non-medical legalization, and non-medical commercialization. Changes for each policy change were examined overall and across race/ethnicity, youth (&lt;18) vs adult (18 or 21+), and sex. Evidence was analyzed by Synthesis without Meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2,806 studies, 17 studies set in North America were included (15 USA, 2 Canada). In regions where non-medical cannabis was criminalized, 0 % of studies (0/4) showed a significant reduction in cannabis offences after medical legalization, 100 % of studies (7/7) showed significant reductions after decriminalization, and 75 % of studies (6/8) showed significant reductions after non-medical legalization with reductions in offences ranging from 13.5 % to 78.0 % for decriminalization and 33 % to 87 % for legalization. In jurisdictions that had decriminalized cannabis use, non-medical legalization was associated with further significant reductions in cannabis offences in 67 % of studies (2/3), with reductions in offences ranging from 35 % to 84.2 %. There were insufficient studies on the effects of expanded non-medical commercial access (<em>n</em> = 2). Decriminalization was associated with a significant reduction in cannabis offences in all studies in youth (5/5) and 85 % of studies in adults (6/7). However, legalization was associated with significant reductions in youth offences in 33 % (1/3) of studies compared to 100 % (4/4) of studies in adults. Despite absolute reductions in cannabis offences after decriminalization and legalization across racial and ethnic groups, changes in relative disparities between groups were variable, increasing in some cases while decreasing in others.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-medical cannabis decriminalization and legalization are both associated with reductions in cannabis offences. Reductions in cannabis offences were consistently observed after legalization in adults but were not consistently observed in youth. Persistent socio-ethnic disparities in cannabis offences emphasize the need for additional mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While a key goal of liberalizing cannabis policy is to reduce harms related to criminal justice involvement, the degree to which this occurs and how it varies by policy format is uncertain. We completed a systematic review of changes in cannabis offences overall and across subgroups after cannabis policy liberalization.

Methods

A search of 7 databases was conducted for studies examining changes in cannabis offences, including arrests, charges, convictions, and referrals, before and after cannabis policy changes. Four types of cannabis policy change were considered: medical legalization, non-medical decriminalization, non-medical legalization, and non-medical commercialization. Changes for each policy change were examined overall and across race/ethnicity, youth (<18) vs adult (18 or 21+), and sex. Evidence was analyzed by Synthesis without Meta-analysis.

Results

From 2,806 studies, 17 studies set in North America were included (15 USA, 2 Canada). In regions where non-medical cannabis was criminalized, 0 % of studies (0/4) showed a significant reduction in cannabis offences after medical legalization, 100 % of studies (7/7) showed significant reductions after decriminalization, and 75 % of studies (6/8) showed significant reductions after non-medical legalization with reductions in offences ranging from 13.5 % to 78.0 % for decriminalization and 33 % to 87 % for legalization. In jurisdictions that had decriminalized cannabis use, non-medical legalization was associated with further significant reductions in cannabis offences in 67 % of studies (2/3), with reductions in offences ranging from 35 % to 84.2 %. There were insufficient studies on the effects of expanded non-medical commercial access (n = 2). Decriminalization was associated with a significant reduction in cannabis offences in all studies in youth (5/5) and 85 % of studies in adults (6/7). However, legalization was associated with significant reductions in youth offences in 33 % (1/3) of studies compared to 100 % (4/4) of studies in adults. Despite absolute reductions in cannabis offences after decriminalization and legalization across racial and ethnic groups, changes in relative disparities between groups were variable, increasing in some cases while decreasing in others.

Conclusion

Non-medical cannabis decriminalization and legalization are both associated with reductions in cannabis offences. Reductions in cannabis offences were consistently observed after legalization in adults but were not consistently observed in youth. Persistent socio-ethnic disparities in cannabis offences emphasize the need for additional mitigation strategies.
评估大麻非刑事化和合法化与大麻逮捕和相关差异之间的关系:系统审查。
背景:虽然放宽大麻政策的一个关键目标是减少与刑事司法参与有关的危害,但这种情况发生的程度以及因政策形式而异的情况是不确定的。我们完成了对大麻政策自由化后大麻犯罪总体和跨子群体变化的系统审查。方法:对7个数据库进行了搜索,以研究大麻犯罪的变化,包括逮捕、指控、定罪和转介,在大麻政策变化前后。审议了四种大麻政策变化:医疗合法化、非医疗非犯罪化、非医疗合法化和非医疗商业化。每项政策变化的变化都被全面检查,并跨越种族/民族,青年(结果:从2,806项研究中,包括17项在北美的研究(15项美国,2项加拿大)。在将非医用大麻定为犯罪的区域,0%的研究(0/4)表明,医用大麻合法化后大麻犯罪显著减少,100%的研究(7/7)表明,非医用大麻合法化后大麻犯罪显著减少,75%的研究(6/8)表明,非医用大麻合法化后大麻犯罪显著减少,非医用大麻犯罪减少13.5%至78.0%,医用大麻合法化犯罪减少33%至87%。在大麻使用非刑事化的司法管辖区,67%的研究(2/3)表明,非医疗合法化与大麻犯罪进一步大幅减少有关,犯罪减少幅度从35%到84.2%不等。关于扩大非医疗商业获取的影响的研究不足(n = 2)。在所有针对青年的研究(5/5)和85%针对成人的研究(6/7)中,除罪化与大麻犯罪的显著减少有关。然而,33%(1/3)的研究表明,与100%(4/4)的成人研究相比,合法化与青少年犯罪的显著减少有关。尽管各种族和族裔群体在大麻非刑事化和合法化后,大麻犯罪的绝对数量有所减少,但群体之间的相对差异变化不一,在某些情况下增加,而在另一些情况下减少。结论:非医用大麻非刑事化和合法化都与大麻犯罪的减少有关。大麻合法化后,大麻犯罪在成年人中持续减少,但在青少年中却没有持续减少。大麻犯罪方面持续存在的社会族裔差异凸显了制定更多缓解战略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信