Mathew Hargreaves, Audria Wood, Nick Manfredi, Dev Dayal, Jacobi Hudson, Kaitlin Higgins Pyrz, Mike Bagwell, Aaron Casp, Thomas Evely, Eugene Brabston, Kevin Wilk, Amit Momaya
{"title":"A High Percentage of Healthy Volunteers Fail to Pass Criteria-based Return to Sport Testing for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.","authors":"Mathew Hargreaves, Audria Wood, Nick Manfredi, Dev Dayal, Jacobi Hudson, Kaitlin Higgins Pyrz, Mike Bagwell, Aaron Casp, Thomas Evely, Eugene Brabston, Kevin Wilk, Amit Momaya","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether healthy volunteers can pass a previously published criteria-based return to sport (CBRTS) protocol after Bankart repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective evaluation of asymptomatic volunteers conducted in March 2024. This study included 26 volunteers with no history of upper-extremity injury or surgery. Volunteers were assessed according to a published CBRTS protocol: (1) isometric testing of external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) in the supine and prone position assessed by hand-held dynamometry; (2) isokinetic strength testing of ER and IR assessed by isokinetic dynamometry; (3) endurance testing of side lying ER, prone ER, and prone Y test; and (4) functional testing via closed kinetic chain upper extremity (CKCUE) stability test and unilateral shot put test. A limb symmetry index (LSI) and proportion of volunteers who passed each test were calculated. A passing LSI value was defined as LSI within 10% of the contralateral side, except for the shot put test, for which a passing value was defined as 80% ≤ LSI ≤ 110%. A passing score for the CKCUE stability test was ≥21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No individual participant passed all the tests; instead, an individual on average passed 47% of the CBRTS protocol. On average, the proportion of participants who passed isometric testing was 60.6% (range 46.2-69.2). For isokinetic testing, the proportion of participants passing was 41.4% (range 30.8-57.7). For endurance testing, the proportion of participants passing was 23.1% (range 19.2-30.8). Lastly, 50% of participants passed the CKCUE stability test, whereas 96.2% passed the unilateral shot put test. A nondominant arm deficit was apparent in 4 of the 12 bilateral arm tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that a high percentage of healthy individuals are unable to pass many of the post-Bankart repair CBRTS protocol tests. Specifically, no participant passed all the tests and individuals only passed 47% of the tests on average.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, prospective single-cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether healthy volunteers can pass a previously published criteria-based return to sport (CBRTS) protocol after Bankart repair.
Methods: This was a prospective evaluation of asymptomatic volunteers conducted in March 2024. This study included 26 volunteers with no history of upper-extremity injury or surgery. Volunteers were assessed according to a published CBRTS protocol: (1) isometric testing of external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) in the supine and prone position assessed by hand-held dynamometry; (2) isokinetic strength testing of ER and IR assessed by isokinetic dynamometry; (3) endurance testing of side lying ER, prone ER, and prone Y test; and (4) functional testing via closed kinetic chain upper extremity (CKCUE) stability test and unilateral shot put test. A limb symmetry index (LSI) and proportion of volunteers who passed each test were calculated. A passing LSI value was defined as LSI within 10% of the contralateral side, except for the shot put test, for which a passing value was defined as 80% ≤ LSI ≤ 110%. A passing score for the CKCUE stability test was ≥21.
Results: No individual participant passed all the tests; instead, an individual on average passed 47% of the CBRTS protocol. On average, the proportion of participants who passed isometric testing was 60.6% (range 46.2-69.2). For isokinetic testing, the proportion of participants passing was 41.4% (range 30.8-57.7). For endurance testing, the proportion of participants passing was 23.1% (range 19.2-30.8). Lastly, 50% of participants passed the CKCUE stability test, whereas 96.2% passed the unilateral shot put test. A nondominant arm deficit was apparent in 4 of the 12 bilateral arm tests.
Conclusions: This study shows that a high percentage of healthy individuals are unable to pass many of the post-Bankart repair CBRTS protocol tests. Specifically, no participant passed all the tests and individuals only passed 47% of the tests on average.
Level of evidence: Level III, prospective single-cohort study.
期刊介绍：
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
