Continuous Quality Improvement in Social Needs Screening: Evaluation of an Intervention in Bariatric Specialty Care.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000461
Claire Chang, Samantha Cooley, Bradley Iott, Jordan Greene, Dilhara Muthukuda, Renuka Tipirneni
{"title":"Continuous Quality Improvement in Social Needs Screening: Evaluation of an Intervention in Bariatric Specialty Care.","authors":"Claire Chang, Samantha Cooley, Bradley Iott, Jordan Greene, Dilhara Muthukuda, Renuka Tipirneni","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With growing recognition of the influence that social risks, such as food insecurity and housing instability, have on individual and population health, social risk screening and social care interventions have proliferated across the health system. Social needs intervention research on screening and referral in specialty care is limited, despite evidence that social needs influence access to and outcomes of surgical and specialty care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a qualitative, formative evaluation of a quality improvement-oriented social needs screening and referral pilot program implemented in a bariatric surgery practice and aims to share lessons related to the structure and process components of a quality improvement (QI) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Semistructured interviews revealed variation in patient eligibility for resources and highlighted the need for enhanced staff capacity and data system integration. In addition, process-related themes including patient hesitation toward referrals, variability in screening pathways, and uncertainty surrounding communication practices emerged in qualitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of social needs screening and referral programs in specialty care setting is feasible but requires unique structure and process-related considerations. Incorporating QI infrastructure into these programs allows for continuous evaluation of program processes and can be used to evaluate the impact of these programs on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With growing recognition of the influence that social risks, such as food insecurity and housing instability, have on individual and population health, social risk screening and social care interventions have proliferated across the health system. Social needs intervention research on screening and referral in specialty care is limited, despite evidence that social needs influence access to and outcomes of surgical and specialty care.

Methods: This study is a qualitative, formative evaluation of a quality improvement-oriented social needs screening and referral pilot program implemented in a bariatric surgery practice and aims to share lessons related to the structure and process components of a quality improvement (QI) framework.

Results: Semistructured interviews revealed variation in patient eligibility for resources and highlighted the need for enhanced staff capacity and data system integration. In addition, process-related themes including patient hesitation toward referrals, variability in screening pathways, and uncertainty surrounding communication practices emerged in qualitative analyses.

Conclusions: Implementation of social needs screening and referral programs in specialty care setting is feasible but requires unique structure and process-related considerations. Incorporating QI infrastructure into these programs allows for continuous evaluation of program processes and can be used to evaluate the impact of these programs on health outcomes.

社会需求筛查的持续质量改进:肥胖专科护理干预的评估。
导言:随着人们日益认识到粮食不安全和住房不稳定等社会风险对个人和人口健康的影响,社会风险筛查和社会保健干预措施在整个卫生系统中得到了广泛应用。尽管有证据表明社会需求影响外科和专科护理的获得和结果,但对专科护理的筛查和转诊的社会需求干预研究是有限的。方法:本研究对在某减肥手术实践中实施的以质量改进为导向的社会需求筛查和转诊试点项目进行定性、形成性评估,旨在分享质量改进(QI)框架的结构和过程组成部分的相关经验教训。结果:半结构化访谈揭示了患者对资源的资格差异,并强调了提高工作人员能力和数据系统集成的必要性。此外,定性分析中出现了与过程相关的主题,包括患者对转诊的犹豫、筛查途径的可变性以及围绕沟通实践的不确定性。结论:在专科护理环境中实施社会需求筛查和转诊方案是可行的,但需要独特的结构和流程相关的考虑。将质量保证基础设施纳入这些规划,可以对规划过程进行持续评估,并可用于评估这些规划对健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信