Breaking the frailty cycle with rehabilitation programs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Bruna da Silveira, Amanda Farias E Farias, Victória Brum, Marlus Karsten, Darlan Laurício Matte
{"title":"Breaking the frailty cycle with rehabilitation programs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bruna da Silveira, Amanda Farias E Farias, Victória Brum, Marlus Karsten, Darlan Laurício Matte","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2460728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate how different sets of rehabilitation programs can contribute to breaking the frailty cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of rehabilitation programs for adults with FS. Search for references on Embase, PEDro, SciELO, Web Of Science, Pubmed, EBSCO and Scopus, published until September 2024. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro scale, risk of bias with ROB 2.0, and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies (34) were included, with high methodological quality and a low risk of bias. There is significant evidence that rehabilitation programs were able to improve performance in activities of daily living (SMD = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.26, 1.40; <i>p</i> = 0.004; low certainty), lower extremity function and mobility (SMD = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.40, 0.86; <i>p</i> < 0.001; moderate certainty) and gait speed (SMD = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.17, 1.97; <i>p</i> = 0.002; low certainty), reducing frailty score (SMD = -1.57; 95%CI: -2.97, -0.17; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001; very low certainty) and prevalence of frailty (RR = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.65, 0.89; <i>p</i> = 0.006; very low certainty), with minimal to no reports of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rehabilitation programs consisting of multicomponent moderate-intensity physical exercise associated with nutritional monitoring, cognitive training, educational strategies, and medical and social support are effective to break the frailty cycle.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation programs for older people can prevent and reverse pre-frailty.Performance, mobility, gait speed and strength improve with rehabilitation programs.Rehabilitation professionals should considerer these key components when designing rehabilitation programs for the frail and pre-frail older people: multicomponent exercises, nutrition, and cognitive training.Rehabilitation professionals should be aware that adherence is the main barrier in older peoples frailty rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2460728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how different sets of rehabilitation programs can contribute to breaking the frailty cycle.

Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of rehabilitation programs for adults with FS. Search for references on Embase, PEDro, SciELO, Web Of Science, Pubmed, EBSCO and Scopus, published until September 2024. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro scale, risk of bias with ROB 2.0, and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach.

Results: Thirty-four studies (34) were included, with high methodological quality and a low risk of bias. There is significant evidence that rehabilitation programs were able to improve performance in activities of daily living (SMD = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.26, 1.40; p = 0.004; low certainty), lower extremity function and mobility (SMD = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.40, 0.86; p < 0.001; moderate certainty) and gait speed (SMD = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.17, 1.97; p = 0.002; low certainty), reducing frailty score (SMD = -1.57; 95%CI: -2.97, -0.17; p ≤ 0.001; very low certainty) and prevalence of frailty (RR = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.65, 0.89; p = 0.006; very low certainty), with minimal to no reports of adverse effects.

Conclusions: Rehabilitation programs consisting of multicomponent moderate-intensity physical exercise associated with nutritional monitoring, cognitive training, educational strategies, and medical and social support are effective to break the frailty cycle.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation programs for older people can prevent and reverse pre-frailty.Performance, mobility, gait speed and strength improve with rehabilitation programs.Rehabilitation professionals should considerer these key components when designing rehabilitation programs for the frail and pre-frail older people: multicomponent exercises, nutrition, and cognitive training.Rehabilitation professionals should be aware that adherence is the main barrier in older peoples frailty rehabilitation programs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信