Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated With Type 1a Selective Alpha-Blockers in VigiBase.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000790
Jonathan J Song, Zhiyu Jason Qian, Mansoo Cho, David-Dan Nguyen, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Daniel A Wollin
{"title":"Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated With Type 1a Selective Alpha-Blockers in VigiBase.","authors":"Jonathan J Song, Zhiyu Jason Qian, Mansoo Cho, David-Dan Nguyen, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Daniel A Wollin","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some evidence suggests no association between type 1a (T1a) selective alpha-blockers and hypotension-related adverse drug reactions (HR-ADRs), although safety concerns still exist. We sought to investigate the association of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers and identify at-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used disproportionality analysis to detect signals of HR-ADRs (dizziness, fainting, falls, and fractures) reported with selective T1a blocker use (tamsulosin and silodosin) in VigiBase, a global database of individual case safety reports. Excluding duplicates, all reports were included (1967-2022). Significance was determined using lower bound 95% empiric Bayes estimator > 1; only then were reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% CIs reported. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and indication for men only (urinary stone disease [USD] and benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5963 reports of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers. Selective T1a blockers were significantly associated with HR-ADRs (ROR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.49). In men, selective T1a blockers for USD were associated with increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.60; 95% CI 1.56-1.65), which only remained significant in the older subgroup (ROR 6.70; 95% CI 3.20-14.01). No association was found for BPH. In women, selective T1a blockers were associated with an increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.09; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). This was only significant in the younger subgroup (ROR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older men with USD and younger women, selective T1a blockers were associated with higher risk of HR-ADRs, suggesting the need for continued monitoring in these populations. No signal was observed for men with BPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"433-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Some evidence suggests no association between type 1a (T1a) selective alpha-blockers and hypotension-related adverse drug reactions (HR-ADRs), although safety concerns still exist. We sought to investigate the association of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers and identify at-risk groups.

Methods: We used disproportionality analysis to detect signals of HR-ADRs (dizziness, fainting, falls, and fractures) reported with selective T1a blocker use (tamsulosin and silodosin) in VigiBase, a global database of individual case safety reports. Excluding duplicates, all reports were included (1967-2022). Significance was determined using lower bound 95% empiric Bayes estimator > 1; only then were reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% CIs reported. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and indication for men only (urinary stone disease [USD] and benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]).

Results: We identified 5963 reports of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers. Selective T1a blockers were significantly associated with HR-ADRs (ROR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.49). In men, selective T1a blockers for USD were associated with increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.60; 95% CI 1.56-1.65), which only remained significant in the older subgroup (ROR 6.70; 95% CI 3.20-14.01). No association was found for BPH. In women, selective T1a blockers were associated with an increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.09; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). This was only significant in the younger subgroup (ROR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32).

Conclusions: In older men with USD and younger women, selective T1a blockers were associated with higher risk of HR-ADRs, suggesting the need for continued monitoring in these populations. No signal was observed for men with BPH.

与1a型选择性α受体阻滞剂相关的低血压相关药物不良反应的歧化分析。
目的:一些证据表明,1a型(T1a)选择性α -受体阻滞剂与降压相关药物不良反应(hr - adr)之间没有关联,尽管安全性问题仍然存在。我们试图调查选择性T1a阻滞剂与hr - adr的关系,并确定高危人群。方法和材料:我们使用歧化分析来检测VigiBase(一个全球个案安全报告数据库)中选择性使用T1a阻滞剂报告的hr - adr(头晕、昏厥、跌倒、骨折)信号。排除重复,所有报告(1967年至2022年)均被纳入。使用下限95%经验贝叶斯估计器>1确定显著性;然后才报告优势比(ROR)和95%置信区间(CI)。亚组分析按性别、年龄分层(结果:我们发现5963例选择性T1a阻滞剂的hr - adr报告。选择性T1a阻滞剂与hr - adr显著相关(ROR 1.46;95% ci 1.42-1.49)。在男性中,选择性T1a受体阻滞剂与hr - adr风险增加相关(ROR 1.60;95% CI 1.56-1.65),仅在老年亚组中保持显著性(ROR 6.70;95% ci 3.20-14.01)。未发现与前列腺增生有关。在女性中,选择性T1a受体阻滞剂与hr - adr风险增加相关(ROR 1.09;95% ci 0.99-1.09)。这仅在年轻亚组中具有显著性(ROR 1.17;95% ci 1.03-1.32)。结论:在患有USD的老年男性和年轻女性中,选择性T1a阻滞剂与较高的hr - adr风险相关,提示需要在这些人群中继续监测。男性前列腺增生未见信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信