Jonathan J Song, Zhiyu Jason Qian, Mansoo Cho, David-Dan Nguyen, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Daniel A Wollin
{"title":"Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase.","authors":"Jonathan J Song, Zhiyu Jason Qian, Mansoo Cho, David-Dan Nguyen, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Daniel A Wollin","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Some evidence suggests no association between type 1a (T1a) selective alpha-blockers and hypotension-related adverse drug reactions (HR-ADRs), although safety concerns still exist. We sought to investigate the association of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers and identify at-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We used disproportionality analysis to detect signals of HR-ADRs (dizziness, fainting, falls, fractures) reported with selective T1a blocker use in VigiBase, a global database of individual case safety reports. Excluding duplicates, all reports were included (1967 to 2022). Significance was determined using lower bound 95% Empiric Bayes Estimator >1; only then were reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and indication for men only (urinary stone disease [USD] and benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5963 reports of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers. Selective T1a blockers were significantly associated with HR-ADRs (ROR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.49). In men, selective T1a blockers for USD were associated with increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.60; 95% CI 1.56-1.65), which only remained significant in the older subgroup (ROR 6.70; 95% CI 3.20-14.01). No association was found for BPH. In women, selective T1a blockers were associated with an increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.09; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). This was only significant in the younger subgroup (ROR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older men with USD and younger women, selective T1a blockers were associated with higher risk of HR-ADRs, suggesting continued monitoring in these populations is needed. No signal was observed for men with BPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Some evidence suggests no association between type 1a (T1a) selective alpha-blockers and hypotension-related adverse drug reactions (HR-ADRs), although safety concerns still exist. We sought to investigate the association of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers and identify at-risk groups.
Methods and materials: We used disproportionality analysis to detect signals of HR-ADRs (dizziness, fainting, falls, fractures) reported with selective T1a blocker use in VigiBase, a global database of individual case safety reports. Excluding duplicates, all reports were included (1967 to 2022). Significance was determined using lower bound 95% Empiric Bayes Estimator >1; only then were reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and indication for men only (urinary stone disease [USD] and benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]).
Results: We identified 5963 reports of HR-ADRs with selective T1a blockers. Selective T1a blockers were significantly associated with HR-ADRs (ROR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.49). In men, selective T1a blockers for USD were associated with increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.60; 95% CI 1.56-1.65), which only remained significant in the older subgroup (ROR 6.70; 95% CI 3.20-14.01). No association was found for BPH. In women, selective T1a blockers were associated with an increased risk of HR-ADRs (ROR 1.09; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). This was only significant in the younger subgroup (ROR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32).
Conclusions: In older men with USD and younger women, selective T1a blockers were associated with higher risk of HR-ADRs, suggesting continued monitoring in these populations is needed. No signal was observed for men with BPH.