Association between distance traveled and abortion consideration and completion among people with fetal myelomeningocele

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Steven T. Papastefan MD , Daniel R. Liesman MD , Yuqi Bian BA , Nkechinyelum Q. Ogu MD , Manmeet Singh MS , William S. Marriott MS , Joyceline A. Ito RN , Jessica T. Fry MD , Aimen F. Shaaban MD , Ashish Premkumar MD, PhD
{"title":"Association between distance traveled and abortion consideration and completion among people with fetal myelomeningocele","authors":"Steven T. Papastefan MD ,&nbsp;Daniel R. Liesman MD ,&nbsp;Yuqi Bian BA ,&nbsp;Nkechinyelum Q. Ogu MD ,&nbsp;Manmeet Singh MS ,&nbsp;William S. Marriott MS ,&nbsp;Joyceline A. Ito RN ,&nbsp;Jessica T. Fry MD ,&nbsp;Aimen F. Shaaban MD ,&nbsp;Ashish Premkumar MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the small number of centers performing maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele, many people are required to travel significant distances for perioperative counseling at an experienced center. As part of the decision-making process for the management of myelomeningocele, some pregnant individuals are interested in, and may ultimately proceed with, termination of pregnancy. Additional travel for abortion care may compound psychological and financial burdens for pregnant individuals, given the existing barriers to accessing abortion care across the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the distance traveled to a fetal care center and the consideration and completion of abortion among patients with fetal myelomeningocele.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all singleton myelomeningocele consultations at a single fetal care center in Illinois from 2018 to 2024. The exposure was the distance traveled to the fetal care center defined as miles from the patient's zip code of residence to the fetal care center. Distance was analyzed in two ways: categorically (dichotomized based on median value) and continuously. The primary outcomes were abortion consideration, ascertained by a nurse during fetal care center intake, and abortion completion. Bivariate and multivariate log-binomial regression analyses were performed. A subgroup analysis was performed by participant state of residence. Statistical significance was considered <em>P</em>&lt;.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 133 participants available for the abortion consideration analysis and 157 participants for the abortion completion analysis. Median distance traveled was 39 miles (IQR 15-116 miles). People traveling below the median distance were more likely to identify as Latinx, reside within Illinois, and present at an earlier gestational age when compared with those traveling above the median distance. Distance traveled was independently associated with abortion consideration, after controlling for gestational age at the time of presentation to the fetal care center (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72). When treating the distance traveled as a continuous outcome, for every mile traveled the risk of considering abortion decreased by 1% (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.99). On subgroup analysis, this finding was persistent only among individuals living in Illinois. There was no significant relationship between the distance traveled to the fetal care center and abortion completion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Increased distance traveled is associated with a lower risk of abortion consideration among individuals presenting to a fetal care center for fetal myelomeningocele consultation. These data emphasize the nuanced relationship between fetal diagnosis and abortion and the importance of providing comprehensive reproductive counseling to patients seeking consultation at a fetal care center.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325000321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to the small number of centers performing maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele, many people are required to travel significant distances for perioperative counseling at an experienced center. As part of the decision-making process for the management of myelomeningocele, some pregnant individuals are interested in, and may ultimately proceed with, termination of pregnancy. Additional travel for abortion care may compound psychological and financial burdens for pregnant individuals, given the existing barriers to accessing abortion care across the United States.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the distance traveled to a fetal care center and the consideration and completion of abortion among patients with fetal myelomeningocele.

Study design

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all singleton myelomeningocele consultations at a single fetal care center in Illinois from 2018 to 2024. The exposure was the distance traveled to the fetal care center defined as miles from the patient's zip code of residence to the fetal care center. Distance was analyzed in two ways: categorically (dichotomized based on median value) and continuously. The primary outcomes were abortion consideration, ascertained by a nurse during fetal care center intake, and abortion completion. Bivariate and multivariate log-binomial regression analyses were performed. A subgroup analysis was performed by participant state of residence. Statistical significance was considered P<.05.

Results

There were 133 participants available for the abortion consideration analysis and 157 participants for the abortion completion analysis. Median distance traveled was 39 miles (IQR 15-116 miles). People traveling below the median distance were more likely to identify as Latinx, reside within Illinois, and present at an earlier gestational age when compared with those traveling above the median distance. Distance traveled was independently associated with abortion consideration, after controlling for gestational age at the time of presentation to the fetal care center (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72). When treating the distance traveled as a continuous outcome, for every mile traveled the risk of considering abortion decreased by 1% (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.99). On subgroup analysis, this finding was persistent only among individuals living in Illinois. There was no significant relationship between the distance traveled to the fetal care center and abortion completion.

Conclusions

Increased distance traveled is associated with a lower risk of abortion consideration among individuals presenting to a fetal care center for fetal myelomeningocele consultation. These data emphasize the nuanced relationship between fetal diagnosis and abortion and the importance of providing comprehensive reproductive counseling to patients seeking consultation at a fetal care center.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信