Survey of Firearm Storage Practices and Preferences Among Parents and Caregivers of Children.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Meredith B Haag, Catlin H Dennis, Steven McGaughey, Tess A Gilbert, Susan DeFrancesco, Adrienne R Gallardo, Benjamin D Hoffman, Kathleen F Carlson
{"title":"Survey of Firearm Storage Practices and Preferences Among Parents and Caregivers of Children.","authors":"Meredith B Haag, Catlin H Dennis, Steven McGaughey, Tess A Gilbert, Susan DeFrancesco, Adrienne R Gallardo, Benjamin D Hoffman, Kathleen F Carlson","doi":"10.5811/westjem.21205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The American College of Emergency Physicians supports community- and hospital-based programs that intervene to prevent firearm-related injury. To this end, the distribution of firearm locks or storage devices in the emergency department (ED) may help achieve this target. To inform secure firearm storage programs for households with children and firearms, we examined firearm storage practices, device preferences, and cost tolerance among parents/caregivers of children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 2018-November 2019, we conducted and analyzed an in-person survey of 294 caregivers, aged ≥18, with both children and firearms in the home. Surveys assessed reasons for firearm ownership, storage practices and device preferences among five storage-device options, and prices participants were willing to pay for devices. Practices and preferences were examined by participant characteristics. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (73%) reported personal protection as a reason for owning firearms, and nearly 80% owned at least one firearm storage device. Over half (55%) owned cable locks, but only 36% of owners reported regularly using them. Rapid-access devices (electronic and biometric lockboxes) were less commonly owned (26%) but more likely to be regularly used (73%). The most highly rated storage device features were the following: the ability to store the firearm unloaded (87.3%); the ability to store the firearm loaded (79.1%); and device affordability (65%). Most participants (78%) preferred rapid-access devices over other options. Participants were willing to pay more for products that afforded rapid access to the firearm. Participants reported they would pay a median of $100 for a pushbutton rapid-access product ($80 retail), and $150 for a biometric lockbox ($210 retail).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the storage practices and preferences among firearm-owning households with children can help inform ED injury-prevention screening and firearm safety practice implementation. Our results suggest that rapid-access devices may be the most preferable firearm storage devices for distribution by secure storage programs, and costs are likely minimal given parental/caregiver willingness to pay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"142-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.21205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians supports community- and hospital-based programs that intervene to prevent firearm-related injury. To this end, the distribution of firearm locks or storage devices in the emergency department (ED) may help achieve this target. To inform secure firearm storage programs for households with children and firearms, we examined firearm storage practices, device preferences, and cost tolerance among parents/caregivers of children.

Methods: Between April 2018-November 2019, we conducted and analyzed an in-person survey of 294 caregivers, aged ≥18, with both children and firearms in the home. Surveys assessed reasons for firearm ownership, storage practices and device preferences among five storage-device options, and prices participants were willing to pay for devices. Practices and preferences were examined by participant characteristics. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations of interest.

Results: Most participants (73%) reported personal protection as a reason for owning firearms, and nearly 80% owned at least one firearm storage device. Over half (55%) owned cable locks, but only 36% of owners reported regularly using them. Rapid-access devices (electronic and biometric lockboxes) were less commonly owned (26%) but more likely to be regularly used (73%). The most highly rated storage device features were the following: the ability to store the firearm unloaded (87.3%); the ability to store the firearm loaded (79.1%); and device affordability (65%). Most participants (78%) preferred rapid-access devices over other options. Participants were willing to pay more for products that afforded rapid access to the firearm. Participants reported they would pay a median of $100 for a pushbutton rapid-access product ($80 retail), and $150 for a biometric lockbox ($210 retail).

Conclusion: Understanding the storage practices and preferences among firearm-owning households with children can help inform ED injury-prevention screening and firearm safety practice implementation. Our results suggest that rapid-access devices may be the most preferable firearm storage devices for distribution by secure storage programs, and costs are likely minimal given parental/caregiver willingness to pay.

父母和儿童看护人的枪支储存习惯和偏好调查。
简介:美国急诊医师学会支持以社区和医院为基础的预防枪支相关伤害的干预项目。为此,在急诊科(ED)分配枪支锁或储存装置可能有助于实现这一目标。为了为有儿童和枪支的家庭提供安全的枪支储存方案,我们调查了枪支储存实践、设备偏好和儿童父母/照顾者的成本承受能力。方法:在2018年4月至2019年11月期间,我们对294名年龄≥18岁、家中有儿童和枪支的护理人员进行了面对面调查并进行了分析。调查评估了持有枪支的原因、存储方式和五种存储设备的偏好,以及参与者愿意为设备支付的价格。实践和偏好通过参与者的特征进行检查。我们使用逻辑回归来估计相关的优势比和95%置信区间。结果:大多数参与者(73%)报告个人保护是拥有枪支的原因,近80%的人拥有至少一个枪支储存装置。超过一半(55%)的人拥有电缆锁,但只有36%的人经常使用电缆锁。快速接入设备(电子和生物识别锁箱)不太常见(26%),但更有可能经常使用(73%)。最受好评的存储设备功能是:能够存储未加载的枪支(87.3%);是否有能力存放装好子弹的枪支(79.1%);以及设备的可承受性(65%)。大多数参与者(78%)更喜欢快速接入设备。参与者愿意花更多的钱购买能够快速获得枪支的产品。参与者报告说,他们愿意为一个按钮式快速接入产品支付中位数100美元(零售价为80美元),为一个生物识别锁箱支付中位数150美元(零售价为210美元)。结论:了解有儿童持枪家庭的枪支储存习惯和偏好,有助于ED伤害预防筛查和枪支安全实践的实施。我们的研究结果表明,快速存取设备可能是通过安全存储计划分发的最可取的枪支存储设备,并且考虑到父母/照顾者愿意支付的费用,成本可能最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信