Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
William Bonadio, Connor Welsh, Brad Pradarelli, Yunfai Ng
{"title":"Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis.","authors":"William Bonadio, Connor Welsh, Brad Pradarelli, Yunfai Ng","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to characterize a large group of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular epinephrine (IM EPI) and a corticosteroid (CS), and to determine the impact of pharmacologic intervention on the rate and timing of biphasic reactions (BPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed consecutive children diagnosed with acute anaphylaxis managed in three EDs during a six-year period. All received IM EPI and CS, followed by monitoring for 4-6 hours post-treatment. We analyzed the rate and timing of BPR, comparing the intervals of 0-4 vs 4-48 hours after initiating therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 371 cases of anaphylaxis, of which 357 (94%) received both IM EPI and CS. Of these, 49 (14%) manifested BPR [84% had received prehospital IM EPI] requiring at least one additional dose of IM EPI [14% required ≥2 additional doses]. All BPR episodes occurred within the 0-4 hour interval after initiating therapy, whereas no patient manifested a BPR requiring an additional dose of IM EPI during the 4-48 hours after initiating therapy (<i>P</i> = <0.001, 95% CI 0-1.3%). No patient returned to the ED with recurrence of anaphylaxis symptoms within 48 hours after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 1 in 7 children with anaphylaxis experience a biphasic reaction after receiving intramuscular epinephrine. Children with anaphylaxis who exhibit symptomatic resolution four hours following initiation of therapy have a low risk for subsequently developing BPR. Most BPR cases required only one additional dose of IM EPI to effect resolution. The rate of BPR in those receiving IM EPI and a corticosteroid is significantly lower >4 hours vs <4 hours after initiating therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to characterize a large group of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular epinephrine (IM EPI) and a corticosteroid (CS), and to determine the impact of pharmacologic intervention on the rate and timing of biphasic reactions (BPR).

Methods: We reviewed consecutive children diagnosed with acute anaphylaxis managed in three EDs during a six-year period. All received IM EPI and CS, followed by monitoring for 4-6 hours post-treatment. We analyzed the rate and timing of BPR, comparing the intervals of 0-4 vs 4-48 hours after initiating therapy.

Results: During the study period, there were 371 cases of anaphylaxis, of which 357 (94%) received both IM EPI and CS. Of these, 49 (14%) manifested BPR [84% had received prehospital IM EPI] requiring at least one additional dose of IM EPI [14% required ≥2 additional doses]. All BPR episodes occurred within the 0-4 hour interval after initiating therapy, whereas no patient manifested a BPR requiring an additional dose of IM EPI during the 4-48 hours after initiating therapy (P = <0.001, 95% CI 0-1.3%). No patient returned to the ED with recurrence of anaphylaxis symptoms within 48 hours after discharge.

Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 7 children with anaphylaxis experience a biphasic reaction after receiving intramuscular epinephrine. Children with anaphylaxis who exhibit symptomatic resolution four hours following initiation of therapy have a low risk for subsequently developing BPR. Most BPR cases required only one additional dose of IM EPI to effect resolution. The rate of BPR in those receiving IM EPI and a corticosteroid is significantly lower >4 hours vs <4 hours after initiating therapy.

治疗对儿童过敏反应双相反应发生率的影响。
目的:我们的目标是描述一大批因急性过敏反应而就诊于急诊科(ED)的儿童,他们接受肌肉注射肾上腺素(IM EPI)和皮质类固醇(CS)治疗,并确定药物干预对双相反应(BPR)的发生率和时间的影响。方法:我们回顾了在6年期间3个急诊科连续诊断为急性过敏反应的儿童。所有患者均接受IM EPI和CS治疗,治疗后监测4-6小时。我们分析了BPR的发生率和时间,比较了开始治疗后0-4小时和4-48小时的间隔。结果:研究期间共发生过敏反应371例,其中357例(94%)同时接受IM EPI和CS治疗。其中,49例(14%)表现为BPR[84%接受院前IM EPI],需要至少1次额外IM EPI[14%需要≥2次额外剂量]。所有的BPR发作都发生在开始治疗后的0-4小时间隔内,而在开始治疗后的4-48小时内,没有患者表现出需要额外剂量的IM EPI的BPR (P =结论:大约1 / 7的过敏反应儿童在接受肌肉注射肾上腺素后出现双相反应。过敏反应儿童在开始治疗后4小时症状消退,随后发生BPR的风险较低。大多数BPR病例只需要再注射一剂IM EPI即可达到缓解效果。在接受IM、EPI和皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,BPR的发生率明显低于40小时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信