Alexandra Mannix, Thomas Beardsley, Thomas Alcorn, Morgan Sweere, Michael Gottlieb
{"title":"Emergency Medicine Clerkship Grading Scheme, Grade, and Rank-List Distribution as Reported on Standardized Letters of Evaluation.","authors":"Alexandra Mannix, Thomas Beardsley, Thomas Alcorn, Morgan Sweere, Michael Gottlieb","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) is a crucial component of the emergency medicine (EM) application process. Given the critical role of the SLOE, we attempted to better understand the grading scales used, as well as the distribution of grades and rank-list positions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary objective in this study was to determine the distribution of grading formats, grades given, and rank-list positions across EM clerkships using the SLOE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study of the grading formats, grades given, and ranking distributions as reported on the SLOE during the 2022-23 application cycle. We obtained data on SLOEs from EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education by reviewing all applicants who applied to either of two EM residency programs in geographically different regions. Trained abstractors recorded the following data: number of students rotating in the prior year; grading format used; and grade and rank distribution among students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 264 programs in our final analysis, after 13 programs met exclusion criteria. The majority of programs (72.2%) use an Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme. We determined the mean percent of each grade: Honors/A 27.6%; High Pass/B 31.1%; Pass/C 40.8%; Low Pass/D 0.2%; and Fail/F 0.3%. Finally, we determined the mean percent for each rank-list position: top 10% was 17.6%; top third 36.5%; mid third 34.1%; and low third 11.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We determined the grading schemes and grade and rank-list distributions for EM programs during the 2022-2023 academic year. Most programs used a Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme, with the majority of students receiving Honors or High Pass, while 0.3% failed their rotation. Both grades and rank list demonstrated evidence of a skewed distribution toward higher grades and rank-list position.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"66-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) is a crucial component of the emergency medicine (EM) application process. Given the critical role of the SLOE, we attempted to better understand the grading scales used, as well as the distribution of grades and rank-list positions.
Objectives: Our primary objective in this study was to determine the distribution of grading formats, grades given, and rank-list positions across EM clerkships using the SLOE.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of the grading formats, grades given, and ranking distributions as reported on the SLOE during the 2022-23 application cycle. We obtained data on SLOEs from EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education by reviewing all applicants who applied to either of two EM residency programs in geographically different regions. Trained abstractors recorded the following data: number of students rotating in the prior year; grading format used; and grade and rank distribution among students.
Results: We included 264 programs in our final analysis, after 13 programs met exclusion criteria. The majority of programs (72.2%) use an Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme. We determined the mean percent of each grade: Honors/A 27.6%; High Pass/B 31.1%; Pass/C 40.8%; Low Pass/D 0.2%; and Fail/F 0.3%. Finally, we determined the mean percent for each rank-list position: top 10% was 17.6%; top third 36.5%; mid third 34.1%; and low third 11.8%.
Conclusion: We determined the grading schemes and grade and rank-list distributions for EM programs during the 2022-2023 academic year. Most programs used a Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme, with the majority of students receiving Honors or High Pass, while 0.3% failed their rotation. Both grades and rank list demonstrated evidence of a skewed distribution toward higher grades and rank-list position.
背景:标准化评估信(SLOE)是急诊医学(EM)申请过程中的重要组成部分。鉴于SLOE的关键作用,我们试图更好地理解所使用的评分标准,以及等级和排名位置的分布。目的:我们在这项研究中的主要目的是确定使用SLOE的评分格式、给出的分数和EM职员的排名。方法:我们对2022-23年申请周期中报告的swe评分格式、给出的分数和排名分布进行了横断面研究。我们从研究生医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)认可的EM住院医师项目中获得了sloe的数据,通过审查所有申请不同地理区域的EM住院医师项目的申请人。训练有素的文摘人员记录了以下数据:上一年轮换的学生人数;采用的评分格式;以及学生之间的年级和等级分布。结果:我们在最终分析中纳入了264个方案,其中13个方案符合排除标准。大多数课程(72.2%)使用荣誉/高及格/及格/不及格评分方案。我们确定了每个年级的平均百分比:荣誉/A 27.6%;High Pass/B 31.1%;通过/ C 40.8%;低通/D 0.2%;Fail/F 0.3%。最后,我们确定了每个排名位置的平均百分比:前10%为17.6%;前三名36.5%;中三分之一34.1%;第三位是11.8%。结论:我们确定了2022-2023学年EM专业的评分方案和等级和排名分布。大多数课程采用荣誉/高及格/及格/不及格评分方案,大多数学生获得荣誉或高及格,而0.3%的学生未能轮换。成绩和排名都显示了向更高的成绩和排名位置倾斜的分布证据。
期刊介绍:
WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.