Evaluating Outcomes of Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Nationwide Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1177/15533506241313242
Wardah Rafaqat, Abiha Abdullah, May Abiad, Matthew McEvoy, Shannon McChensey, Hanjoo Lee, Baryalay Khan, Alexander T Hawkins, Aimal Khan
{"title":"Evaluating Outcomes of Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Nationwide Analysis.","authors":"Wardah Rafaqat, Abiha Abdullah, May Abiad, Matthew McEvoy, Shannon McChensey, Hanjoo Lee, Baryalay Khan, Alexander T Hawkins, Aimal Khan","doi":"10.1177/15533506241313242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdvances in Enhanced Recovery After Colectomy protocols have enabled same day discharge (SDD) in some patients. Current literature is limited to single institutions limiting generalizability. We employed a nationally-representative dataset to compare outcomes between SDD patients and patients with a short-term hospital stay (discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy Participant User Files (2017-2021). We included patients ≥18 years who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomy. We excluded patients with severe comorbid conditions or in-hospital complications. We performed a 1:1 propensity-match adjusting for patient, diagnosis, and procedure- type characteristics. Our primary outcome was 30-day readmission and secondary outcome was post-discharge complications.ResultsWe identified 22,482 patients, 740 (3.3%) of which were SDD patients. A higher proportion of patients with SDD underwent right colectomy (76.4% vs36.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and carried a diagnosis of a benign neoplasm (53.0% vs18.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). After propensity matching there was no significant difference in the rate of 30-day readmission between the 2 groups (3.4% vs4.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.23). Additionally, there was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak (0.7% vs0.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.58) or colonic ileus (1.4% vs1.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.58). Post-discharge bleeding complications were higher in SDD patients (0.5% vs0%; <i>P</i> = 0.045).ConclusionsSDD following minimally invasive colectomy is not associated with higher readmission, anastomotic leak, or SSI when compared to patients discharged on postoperative day 1/2. SDD after minimally invasive colectomy may be considered for patients without severe comorbid conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"235-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241313242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAdvances in Enhanced Recovery After Colectomy protocols have enabled same day discharge (SDD) in some patients. Current literature is limited to single institutions limiting generalizability. We employed a nationally-representative dataset to compare outcomes between SDD patients and patients with a short-term hospital stay (discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy Participant User Files (2017-2021). We included patients ≥18 years who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomy. We excluded patients with severe comorbid conditions or in-hospital complications. We performed a 1:1 propensity-match adjusting for patient, diagnosis, and procedure- type characteristics. Our primary outcome was 30-day readmission and secondary outcome was post-discharge complications.ResultsWe identified 22,482 patients, 740 (3.3%) of which were SDD patients. A higher proportion of patients with SDD underwent right colectomy (76.4% vs36.4%, P < 0.001) and carried a diagnosis of a benign neoplasm (53.0% vs18.1%, P < 0.001). After propensity matching there was no significant difference in the rate of 30-day readmission between the 2 groups (3.4% vs4.7%; P = 0.23). Additionally, there was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak (0.7% vs0.8%; P = 0.58) or colonic ileus (1.4% vs1.8%; P = 0.58). Post-discharge bleeding complications were higher in SDD patients (0.5% vs0%; P = 0.045).ConclusionsSDD following minimally invasive colectomy is not associated with higher readmission, anastomotic leak, or SSI when compared to patients discharged on postoperative day 1/2. SDD after minimally invasive colectomy may be considered for patients without severe comorbid conditions.

评估微创结肠切除术后当日出院的结果:一项全国性分析。
背景:增强结肠切除术后恢复方案的进展使一些患者能够当天出院(SDD)。目前的文献仅限于单一机构,限制了普遍性。我们采用了一个具有全国代表性的数据集来比较SDD患者和短期住院患者(术后第1天或第2天出院)的结果。方法:我们使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进项目(ACS-NSQIP)靶向结肠切除术参与者用户文件(2017-2021)进行了一项回顾性研究。我们纳入了≥18岁接受选择性微创结肠切除术的患者。我们排除了有严重合并症或院内并发症的患者。我们对患者、诊断和手术类型特征进行了1:1的倾向匹配调整。我们的主要终点是30天再入院,次要终点是出院后并发症。结果:我们确定了22,482例患者,其中740例(3.3%)为SDD患者。SDD患者行右结肠切除术(76.4% vs36.4%, P < 0.001)和诊断为良性肿瘤的比例较高(53.0% vs18.1%, P < 0.001)。倾向匹配后,两组患者30天再入院率无显著差异(3.4% vs4.7%;P = 0.23)。此外,两组吻合口瘘发生率无统计学差异(0.7% vs0.8%;P = 0.58)或结肠肠梗阻(1.4% vs1.8%;P = 0.58)。SDD患者出院后出血并发症较高(0.5% vs0%;P = 0.045)。结论:与术后1/2天出院的患者相比,微创结肠切除术后SDD与更高的再入院率、吻合口漏或SSI无关。无严重合并症的患者可考虑微创结肠切除术后的SDD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信