Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder After Prior Non-Cesarean Delivery Uterine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ru Yang, Lizi Zhang, Lu Sun, Jianli Wu, Shilei Bi, Miao Hu, Shijun Luo, Fang He, Jingsi Chen, Lin Yu, Qiying Zhu, Dunjin Chen, Lili Du
{"title":"Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder After Prior Non-Cesarean Delivery Uterine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ru Yang, Lizi Zhang, Lu Sun, Jianli Wu, Shilei Bi, Miao Hu, Shijun Luo, Fang He, Jingsi Chen, Lin Yu, Qiying Zhu, Dunjin Chen, Lili Du","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between previous non-cesarean uterine surgery and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in subsequent pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wan-fang Database were searched from inception to April 2024, supplemented by manual searches.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies included prospective, retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies involving pregnant women diagnosed with PAS and reporting at least one risk factor associated with previous uterine surgery.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Two authors independently screened potentially eligible studies and extracted data. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled odds ratios (ORs), adjusted ORs, and their 95% CIs were estimated with fixed- or random-effects models if the heterogeneity (I2) was high. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for potential study bias. The main measures were myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, dilatation and curettage, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, abortion, endometrial ablation, and operative hysteroscopy. A total of 38 studies involving 7,353,177 participants were included in the systematic review, with an overall prevalence of PAS of 0.16%, and 31 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Prior non-cesarean uterine surgeries were associated with PAS in subsequent pregnancy (pooled OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.43-3.68). Distinct associations between specific uterine surgery and PAS included myomectomy (OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.77-2.97), uterine artery embolization (OR 43.16, 95% CI, 20.50-90.88), dilatation and curettage (OR 2.28, 95% CI, 1.78-2.93), hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (OR 7.72, 95% CI, 4.10-14.53), abortion (OR 1.65, 95% CI, 1.43-1.92), endometrial ablation (OR 20.26, 95% CI, 17.15-23.93), and operative hysteroscopy (OR 3.10, 95% CI, 1.86-5.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior non-cesarean uterine surgery is associated with a significantly increased odds for development of PAS in subsequent pregnancy, and the risk varies depending on the types of uterine surgery.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42024552210.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between previous non-cesarean uterine surgery and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in subsequent pregnancies.

Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wan-fang Database were searched from inception to April 2024, supplemented by manual searches.

Methods of study selection: Studies included prospective, retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies involving pregnant women diagnosed with PAS and reporting at least one risk factor associated with previous uterine surgery.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Two authors independently screened potentially eligible studies and extracted data. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled odds ratios (ORs), adjusted ORs, and their 95% CIs were estimated with fixed- or random-effects models if the heterogeneity (I2) was high. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for potential study bias. The main measures were myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, dilatation and curettage, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, abortion, endometrial ablation, and operative hysteroscopy. A total of 38 studies involving 7,353,177 participants were included in the systematic review, with an overall prevalence of PAS of 0.16%, and 31 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Prior non-cesarean uterine surgeries were associated with PAS in subsequent pregnancy (pooled OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.43-3.68). Distinct associations between specific uterine surgery and PAS included myomectomy (OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.77-2.97), uterine artery embolization (OR 43.16, 95% CI, 20.50-90.88), dilatation and curettage (OR 2.28, 95% CI, 1.78-2.93), hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (OR 7.72, 95% CI, 4.10-14.53), abortion (OR 1.65, 95% CI, 1.43-1.92), endometrial ablation (OR 20.26, 95% CI, 17.15-23.93), and operative hysteroscopy (OR 3.10, 95% CI, 1.86-5.18).

Conclusion: Prior non-cesarean uterine surgery is associated with a significantly increased odds for development of PAS in subsequent pregnancy, and the risk varies depending on the types of uterine surgery.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024552210.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信