Bridging minds: Participant perspectives on postmortem brain research and engagement.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuropathology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1111/neup.13030
Yusuke Inoue, Maki Obata, Maho Morishima, Shigeo Murayama, Yuko Saito
{"title":"Bridging minds: Participant perspectives on postmortem brain research and engagement.","authors":"Yusuke Inoue, Maki Obata, Maho Morishima, Shigeo Murayama, Yuko Saito","doi":"10.1111/neup.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postmortem research participation remains underrepresented in research ethics discussions. Herein, we examined the associated perspectives of individuals preregistered with the Brain Bank for Aging Research at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. We conducted a postal survey targeting 88 preregistrants, yielding 52 responses (response rate: 59.1%, average respondent age: 79.5 years, range: 49-97). The questionnaire gathered information on the reasons for agreeing to participate, helpful information provided during the explanation, and expectations regarding future information. The stated reasons for participating included a desire to contribute to science, gratitude for medical care received, memories of relatives' past donations, and inspiration from staff enthusiasm and materials. Beneficial information was given in brochures, coordinator explanations, and lectures; however, guidance for family members regarding postmortem procedures and updates on recent activities and research outcomes were highlighted as areas requiring future improvement. Willingness to participate in brain banks was influenced by altruistic factors, personal medical experiences, and the influence of statements from close contacts. Registrants maintained their interest after registration and prepare for future arrangements. Family cooperation was identified as a critical factor influencing the fulfillment of participant intentions, emphasizing the need for accessible and low-burden family guidance. Registrants generally seek information to help family members and associates avoid difficulties related to their participation. Brain banks should continue conducting such surveys for registrants and reflect the findings in their information dissemination and educational programs. This approach will help improve the understanding and support for brain bank participation, ultimately contributing to the advancement of medical research and ethics in postmortem studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19204,"journal":{"name":"Neuropathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.13030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postmortem research participation remains underrepresented in research ethics discussions. Herein, we examined the associated perspectives of individuals preregistered with the Brain Bank for Aging Research at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. We conducted a postal survey targeting 88 preregistrants, yielding 52 responses (response rate: 59.1%, average respondent age: 79.5 years, range: 49-97). The questionnaire gathered information on the reasons for agreeing to participate, helpful information provided during the explanation, and expectations regarding future information. The stated reasons for participating included a desire to contribute to science, gratitude for medical care received, memories of relatives' past donations, and inspiration from staff enthusiasm and materials. Beneficial information was given in brochures, coordinator explanations, and lectures; however, guidance for family members regarding postmortem procedures and updates on recent activities and research outcomes were highlighted as areas requiring future improvement. Willingness to participate in brain banks was influenced by altruistic factors, personal medical experiences, and the influence of statements from close contacts. Registrants maintained their interest after registration and prepare for future arrangements. Family cooperation was identified as a critical factor influencing the fulfillment of participant intentions, emphasizing the need for accessible and low-burden family guidance. Registrants generally seek information to help family members and associates avoid difficulties related to their participation. Brain banks should continue conducting such surveys for registrants and reflect the findings in their information dissemination and educational programs. This approach will help improve the understanding and support for brain bank participation, ultimately contributing to the advancement of medical research and ethics in postmortem studies.

衔接思想:参与者对死后大脑研究和参与的看法。
在研究伦理讨论中,参与死后研究的人数仍然不足。在此,我们研究了在东京都老年学研究所衰老研究脑库预注册的个体的相关观点。我们对88名预注册用户进行了邮寄调查,得到52份回复(回复率59.1%,平均年龄79.5岁,范围49-97岁)。问卷收集了同意参与的原因、解释过程中提供的有用信息以及对未来信息的期望。参与的理由包括为科学做出贡献的愿望、对得到的医疗护理的感激、对亲戚过去捐赠的回忆以及工作人员的热情和材料的启发。在小册子、协调员解释和讲座中提供了有益的信息;然而,对家庭成员关于死后程序的指导以及最近活动和研究成果的更新被强调为需要未来改进的领域。参与脑库的意愿受到利他因素、个人医疗经历和亲密接触者陈述的影响。注册人在注册后仍保持兴趣,并为日后的安排作准备。家庭合作被确定为影响参与者意愿实现的一个关键因素,强调需要提供方便和负担低的家庭指导。参加者一般会寻求资料,以帮助家人和同事避免与参加有关的困难。脑库应继续对注册者进行此类调查,并将调查结果反映在其信息传播和教育计划中。这种方法将有助于提高对参与脑库的理解和支持,最终有助于促进医学研究和死后研究的伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropathology
Neuropathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropathology is an international journal sponsored by the Japanese Society of Neuropathology and publishes peer-reviewed original papers dealing with all aspects of human and experimental neuropathology and related fields of research. The Journal aims to promote the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Case Reports, Short Communications, Occasional Reviews, Editorials and Letters to the Editor. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信