The implementation of knowledge-based planning with partial OAR contours for prostate radiotherapy

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ositomiwa O. Osipitan, David Wiant, Han Liu
{"title":"The implementation of knowledge-based planning with partial OAR contours for prostate radiotherapy","authors":"Ositomiwa O. Osipitan,&nbsp;David Wiant,&nbsp;Han Liu","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Intra- and inter-observer contour uncertainty is a continuous challenge in treatment planning for radiotherapy. Our proposed solution to address this challenge is the use of partial contours for treatment planning, focusing on uninvolved or non-overlapping portions of the organs-at-risk (OARs) with the planning target volume (PTV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The partial contours systematically eliminate overlapping regions. The partial contours were evaluated against fully contoured OARs. We incorporated advanced tools like knowledge-based planning (KBP) to create treatment plans and artificial intelligence (AI) to create auto-segmented contours. We developed two models, Rapid Plan (RP) and Rapid Plan partial uninvolved (RP_Part_Un), using 70 previous clinically approved volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans each prescribed with 70 Gy/28 fractions. From these models, we created three plans, RP, RP_Part_Un, and MIM AI_Part_Un. In this retrospective study, 60 prostate patients were analyzed using the three plans. For determining OAR sparing, <i>D</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> along the percent volume receiving a dose over a range (V<sub>10</sub> Gy V<sub>70</sub> Gy) between each plan were compared. Geometric evaluations, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and overlay index (OI) between the OAR contours from partial-contoured manual structure sets and partial-contoured AI structure sets were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When comparing the <i>DSC</i> and <i>OI</i> for full contours to the partial contours, in both groups, all comparisons were significantly increased for both organs. This indicated the partial contours had a higher degree of concordance. In patients with SpaceOAR, RP_Part_Un plans exhibited significantly reduced bladder <i>D</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> compared to RP plans, while rectum <i>D</i><sub>max</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> showed no significant differences. For patients without SpaceOAR, RP_Part_Un significantly lowered rectum <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>. MIM AI_Part_Un plans demonstrated lower rectum <i>D</i><sub>max</sub> in both patient groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Partial contours, defined at a specified distance from the PTV, yielded dosimetry comparable to fully contoured plans, highlighting their potential efficacy in treatment planning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Intra- and inter-observer contour uncertainty is a continuous challenge in treatment planning for radiotherapy. Our proposed solution to address this challenge is the use of partial contours for treatment planning, focusing on uninvolved or non-overlapping portions of the organs-at-risk (OARs) with the planning target volume (PTV).

Methods

The partial contours systematically eliminate overlapping regions. The partial contours were evaluated against fully contoured OARs. We incorporated advanced tools like knowledge-based planning (KBP) to create treatment plans and artificial intelligence (AI) to create auto-segmented contours. We developed two models, Rapid Plan (RP) and Rapid Plan partial uninvolved (RP_Part_Un), using 70 previous clinically approved volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans each prescribed with 70 Gy/28 fractions. From these models, we created three plans, RP, RP_Part_Un, and MIM AI_Part_Un. In this retrospective study, 60 prostate patients were analyzed using the three plans. For determining OAR sparing, Dmax and Dmean along the percent volume receiving a dose over a range (V10 Gy V70 Gy) between each plan were compared. Geometric evaluations, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and overlay index (OI) between the OAR contours from partial-contoured manual structure sets and partial-contoured AI structure sets were analyzed.

Results

When comparing the DSC and OI for full contours to the partial contours, in both groups, all comparisons were significantly increased for both organs. This indicated the partial contours had a higher degree of concordance. In patients with SpaceOAR, RP_Part_Un plans exhibited significantly reduced bladder Dmax and Dmean compared to RP plans, while rectum Dmax and Dmean showed no significant differences. For patients without SpaceOAR, RP_Part_Un significantly lowered rectum Dmean. MIM AI_Part_Un plans demonstrated lower rectum Dmax in both patient groups.

Conclusions

Partial contours, defined at a specified distance from the PTV, yielded dosimetry comparable to fully contoured plans, highlighting their potential efficacy in treatment planning.

Abstract Image

基于知识规划的部分OAR轮廓在前列腺放射治疗中的应用。
目的:观察者内部和观察者之间的轮廓不确定性是放疗治疗计划中一个持续的挑战。针对这一挑战,我们提出的解决方案是使用局部轮廓进行治疗计划,重点关注具有计划目标体积(PTV)的高危器官(OARs)的未涉及或非重叠部分。方法:局部轮廓系统地消除重叠区域。部分轮廓与完全轮廓的桨进行评估。我们采用了先进的工具,如基于知识的计划(KBP)来创建治疗计划,人工智能(AI)来创建自动分割的轮廓。我们开发了两个模型,快速计划(RP)和快速计划部分不受损伤(RP_Part_Un),使用70个临床批准的体积弧治疗(VMAT)计划,每个计划规定70 Gy/28分数。从这些模型中,我们创建了三个计划,RP、RP_Part_Un和MIM AI_Part_Un。在本回顾性研究中,60例前列腺患者采用三种方案进行分析。为了确定OAR节约,比较了每个方案之间在一定范围内(V10 Gy和V70 Gy)接受剂量的体积百分比的Dmax和Dmean。分析了部分轮廓人工结构集和部分轮廓人工智能结构集桨形轮廓之间的几何评价、骰子相似系数(DSC)和覆盖指数(OI)。结果:当比较全轮廓和部分轮廓的DSC和OI时,两组中两个器官的所有比较都显着增加。这表明部分轮廓具有较高的一致性。在SpaceOAR患者中,RP_Part_Un计划与RP计划相比,膀胱Dmax和Dmean显著降低,而直肠Dmax和Dmean无显著差异。对于无SpaceOAR的患者,RP_Part_Un显著降低直肠Dmean。MIM AI_Part_Un计划显示两组患者直肠Dmax均较低。结论:在距离PTV指定距离处定义的部分轮廓线,产生的剂量学与完全轮廓计划相当,突出了它们在治疗计划中的潜在功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信