Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002923
Austin W Li, Jeremy M Adelstein, Lambert T Li, Margaret A Sinkler, R Justin Mistovich
{"title":"Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.","authors":"Austin W Li, Jeremy M Adelstein, Lambert T Li, Margaret A Sinkler, R Justin Mistovich","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet and standard search engines are commonly used resources for patients seeking medical information online. With the advancement and increasing usage of artificial intelligence (AI) in health information, online AI chatbots such as ChatGPT may surpass traditional web search engines as the next go-to online resource for medical information. This study aims to assess the ability of ChatGPT to answer frequently asked questions regarding pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven (7) frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding SCH fractures were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and rated as either \"excellent requiring no clarification (0 items need clarification),\" \"satisfactory requiring minimal clarification (1 to 2 items need clarification),\" \"satisfactory requiring moderate clarification (3 to 4 items need clarification),\" or \"unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification (>4 items need clarification or response contains false information).\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 4 responses met satisfactory ratings with either moderate (2 responses) or minimal (2 responses) clarification, 3 of the 7 FAQs yielded a response from ChatGPT that were unsatisfactory. There were no responses that required no further clarification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT provided some satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding pediatric SCH fractures, but required substantial clarification about treatment algorithms, casting and return to sport timelines, and the utility of physical therapy. Therefore, ChatGPT is an unreliable resource for information on treating SCH fractures. Parents of children who experience SCH fractures should continue to communicate with their doctors for the most accurate medical information.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V-expert opinion on ChatGPT responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The internet and standard search engines are commonly used resources for patients seeking medical information online. With the advancement and increasing usage of artificial intelligence (AI) in health information, online AI chatbots such as ChatGPT may surpass traditional web search engines as the next go-to online resource for medical information. This study aims to assess the ability of ChatGPT to answer frequently asked questions regarding pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures.

Methods: Seven (7) frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding SCH fractures were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and rated as either "excellent requiring no clarification (0 items need clarification)," "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification (1 to 2 items need clarification)," "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification (3 to 4 items need clarification)," or "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification (>4 items need clarification or response contains false information)."

Results: While 4 responses met satisfactory ratings with either moderate (2 responses) or minimal (2 responses) clarification, 3 of the 7 FAQs yielded a response from ChatGPT that were unsatisfactory. There were no responses that required no further clarification.

Conclusions: ChatGPT provided some satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding pediatric SCH fractures, but required substantial clarification about treatment algorithms, casting and return to sport timelines, and the utility of physical therapy. Therefore, ChatGPT is an unreliable resource for information on treating SCH fractures. Parents of children who experience SCH fractures should continue to communicate with their doctors for the most accurate medical information.

Level of evidence: Level V-expert opinion on ChatGPT responses.

评估ChatGPT对儿童肱骨髁上骨折常见问题的回答。
背景:互联网和标准搜索引擎是患者在线查询医疗信息的常用资源。随着人工智能(AI)在健康信息领域的进步和越来越多的应用,像ChatGPT这样的在线AI聊天机器人可能会超越传统的网络搜索引擎,成为下一个在线医疗信息资源。本研究旨在评估ChatGPT回答儿童肱骨髁上骨折(SCH)常见问题的能力。方法:向ChatGPT提出7个关于SCH骨折的常见问题。最初的回答被记录下来,并被评为“优秀无需澄清(0项需要澄清)”,“满意需要最少澄清(1至2项需要澄清)”,“满意需要中等澄清(3至4项需要澄清)”,或“不满意需要大量澄清(>4项需要澄清或回答包含虚假信息)”。结果:虽然有4个回答通过中等(2个回答)或最低(2个回答)澄清达到满意的评级,但ChatGPT的7个常见问题中有3个回答不令人满意。没有任何回应需要进一步澄清。结论:ChatGPT对儿童SCH骨折的常见问题提供了一些令人满意的回答,但需要对治疗算法、铸造和恢复运动时间以及物理治疗的效用进行实质性的澄清。因此,ChatGPT是治疗SCH骨折的不可靠信息来源。儿童发生上胫性骨折的家长应继续与医生沟通,以获得最准确的医疗信息。证据等级:v级——对ChatGPT回应的专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信