Reducing Unnecessary Penicillin Allergy Labels in the Pediatric Surgical Population.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Journal of nursing care quality Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000813
Ann M Hefel, Laura A Wang, Maureen Bauer, Suhong Tong, Gee Mei Tan
{"title":"Reducing Unnecessary Penicillin Allergy Labels in the Pediatric Surgical Population.","authors":"Ann M Hefel, Laura A Wang, Maureen Bauer, Suhong Tong, Gee Mei Tan","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 10% of children report having a penicillin allergy; however many of these are misdiagnoses or the allergy resolves over time. Having an unnecessary penicillin allergy label increases risk of adverse clinical outcomes and increased health care costs.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>At our local pediatric surgical center, the percentage of patients with a penicillin allergy label was 7%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre/postimplementation design was used.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Pediatric surgical patients with a penicillin allergy label were identified and risk-stratified to undergo a single-dose oral provocation test (OPT) to amoxicillin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients underwent an OPT. The percentage of patients with a penicillin allergy label decreased to 6.4% after 6 months ( P = .045). Median wait time for an allergy evaluation decreased from 102 to 42 days ( P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This quality improvement project decreased penicillin allergy labeling rates in pediatric surgical patients, improved access to penicillin allergy evaluation, and had no adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":" ","pages":"125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Up to 10% of children report having a penicillin allergy; however many of these are misdiagnoses or the allergy resolves over time. Having an unnecessary penicillin allergy label increases risk of adverse clinical outcomes and increased health care costs.

Local problem: At our local pediatric surgical center, the percentage of patients with a penicillin allergy label was 7%.

Methods: A pre/postimplementation design was used.

Interventions: Pediatric surgical patients with a penicillin allergy label were identified and risk-stratified to undergo a single-dose oral provocation test (OPT) to amoxicillin.

Results: Forty-two patients underwent an OPT. The percentage of patients with a penicillin allergy label decreased to 6.4% after 6 months ( P = .045). Median wait time for an allergy evaluation decreased from 102 to 42 days ( P < .0001).

Conclusions: This quality improvement project decreased penicillin allergy labeling rates in pediatric surgical patients, improved access to penicillin allergy evaluation, and had no adverse outcomes.

减少儿科外科人群不必要的青霉素过敏标签。
背景:高达10%的儿童报告有青霉素过敏;然而,其中许多是误诊,或者过敏会随着时间的推移而消退。使用不必要的青霉素过敏标签会增加不良临床结果的风险,并增加医疗保健费用。局部问题:在我们当地的儿科外科中心,有青霉素过敏标签的患者比例为7%。方法:采用补前/补后设计。干预措施:确定有青霉素过敏标签的儿科外科患者,并对其进行风险分层,接受阿莫西林单剂量口服激发试验(OPT)。结果:42例患者接受了OPT。6个月后,青霉素过敏标签患者的比例下降到6.4% (P = 0.045)。过敏反应评估的中位等待时间从102天减少到42天(P结论:该质量改进项目降低了儿科外科患者青霉素过敏标记率,改善了青霉素过敏评估的可及性,并且没有不良结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信