Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, María Gabriela Soto, Andrea Rioseco, Catalina Bienzobas, Madeline Fowler, Gonzalo Ulloa, Mauricio Soto, Jon David Emery, Klaus Puschel
{"title":"Are we ready? assessing effectiveness and implementation of cancer control strategies in primary care: a comprehensive review of systematic reviews.","authors":"Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, María Gabriela Soto, Andrea Rioseco, Catalina Bienzobas, Madeline Fowler, Gonzalo Ulloa, Mauricio Soto, Jon David Emery, Klaus Puschel","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a major global cause of death, and primary care is crucial for cancer prevention and early detection. However, there is conflicting information on the effectiveness, implementation, and sustainability of cancer control interventions in primary care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to summarize the evidence for cancer control in primary care, focussing on identifying relevant factors for implementation and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a narrative, mixed-methods review of systematic reviews, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four databases were screened, and two independent reviewers selected studies reporting on cancer prevention, screening, or early detection in primary or community settings. We analysed findings using the extended Reach-Effectiveness-Adopt-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>From the 37 reviews that met the inclusion criteria, 6 focussed on primary prevention, 23 on screening, and 12 on early detection. Most reviews (78%) addressed intervention effectiveness, such as HPV vaccination, tobacco cessation, and cervical, breast, and colorectal screening. One-third of the reviews mentioned adoption and implementation factors, including barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cancer screening programs. Only one review addressed maintenance and sustainability factors, exploring continuous resources and funding strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While numerous interventions are effective for cancer prevention and detection in primary care, literature on implementation and sustainability strategies is lacking. Focusing on continuous resources and funding for cancer strategies in primary care may aid sustainability. Future research should prioritize reporting on implementation and sustainability factors to enhance cancer prevention and control in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer is a major global cause of death, and primary care is crucial for cancer prevention and early detection. However, there is conflicting information on the effectiveness, implementation, and sustainability of cancer control interventions in primary care.
Objective: This study aimed to summarize the evidence for cancer control in primary care, focussing on identifying relevant factors for implementation and sustainability.
Study setting and design: We conducted a narrative, mixed-methods review of systematic reviews, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four databases were screened, and two independent reviewers selected studies reporting on cancer prevention, screening, or early detection in primary or community settings. We analysed findings using the extended Reach-Effectiveness-Adopt-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework.
Principal findings: From the 37 reviews that met the inclusion criteria, 6 focussed on primary prevention, 23 on screening, and 12 on early detection. Most reviews (78%) addressed intervention effectiveness, such as HPV vaccination, tobacco cessation, and cervical, breast, and colorectal screening. One-third of the reviews mentioned adoption and implementation factors, including barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cancer screening programs. Only one review addressed maintenance and sustainability factors, exploring continuous resources and funding strategies.
Conclusion: While numerous interventions are effective for cancer prevention and detection in primary care, literature on implementation and sustainability strategies is lacking. Focusing on continuous resources and funding for cancer strategies in primary care may aid sustainability. Future research should prioritize reporting on implementation and sustainability factors to enhance cancer prevention and control in primary care settings.
期刊介绍:
Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries.
Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration.
The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.